Which war is the least casualistic
this is a q id like liberals to answer
cuz they say iraq is the worst war
heres a list of all us casualties in ACTUAL wars
1.American Civil War (Union and Confederate; 1861-1865) 558,052
2.World War II, see also: World War II casualties 405,399
3.World War I, see also: World War I casualties 116,516
4.Vietnam War 58,209
5.Korean War 36,574
6.Mexican-American War (1846-1848) 13,283
7.War of 1812 (1812-1815) 4,505
8.American Revolutionary War (1775-1783) 4,435+
9.Indian War Estimated over 3000+
10.Philippine-American War (Spanish War Included( (1899-1913) 4,234
11.War On Terror All Iraq And Afghanistan Included 2,890
2006-12-02 20:45:32 · 7 answers · asked by Army__Strong 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
hmmmmm like yur name? non comapsionate hmmmmm sounds...yeahhh makes us look reall good
2006-12-02 20:49:06 · update #1
if u didnt notice i put US CASUALTIES
2006-12-02 20:50:08 · update #2
so what if im conservitive dont get me started i can talk bout u being a liberal all day
2006-12-02 20:50:40 · update #3
and they dont have stats on iraqis dead cuz thewy like to take there bodies so we dont count emm seeee backfired on emm
2006-12-02 20:52:19 · update #4
homer how old r u
2006-12-02 21:00:07 · update #5
Damn...if thats correct numbers, it made me cringe.
I dunno...but those are staggering stats...but...
War can't and never will go away in our world....so those numbers will change again, if world history shows us anything at all.
2006-12-02 23:28:03 · answer #1 · answered by Diadem 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All those other wars were fought against a recognizable opponent. The war on terror is fought against a concept. Why can't you see the difference between the two? Also, could you point me in the direction of people that are calling it the worst war, preferably not on yahoo answers?
2006-12-03 04:55:15 · answer #2 · answered by Paul P 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The link below has a very detailed list of ALL casualties for the current war.
www.icasualties.org/oif/
2006-12-03 07:14:44 · answer #3 · answered by hmparks_usn 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The countries that hate us now, already hated us before. Reputation isn't much affected. 100s of thousands of iraqis huh? Care to substantiate that number, retard?
2006-12-03 04:54:44 · answer #4 · answered by Austin M 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think you left out the hundred thousand or so Iraqis that have died due to the war on terror.......
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7967-2004Oct28.html
http://www.antiwar.com/casualties/
2006-12-03 04:49:27 · answer #5 · answered by PS Drummer 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The damage is to our reputation.
Get it?
The worse is yet to come.
2006-12-03 04:47:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Conservative!!
2006-12-03 04:49:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋