Mind you that music in general sound great - but reggae stands out when one is stoned.
2006-12-02 13:19:58 · 14 answers · asked by Kit 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Isn't everything great when you are stoned? Ha ha
Food, music, people, the weather, television, movies, food,
the sky, food, laughter, food, comedians, food. Did I say food???
2006-12-02 13:22:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's not good for your health to get stoned. Reggae is okay, though.
2006-12-02 13:23:44 · answer #2 · answered by Kharm 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't need to be stoned for reggae to sound gooood! It sounds good fullstop!
2006-12-02 13:22:31 · answer #3 · answered by -♦One-♦-Love♦- 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dunno. I don't get stoned. But I love reggae anyway.
It's GREAT music to groove to while you're doing something you'd rather not be doing, like housework.
It's also terrific "stuck in traffic' music because it keeps you from getting too uptight.
2006-12-02 14:30:46 · answer #4 · answered by Praise Singer 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My short answer is Brian Jones. i for my area locate plenty to love approximately all 3, however. My trendy stuff of theirs is the nice and cozy Rocks compilation, like maximum of human beings. And as albums, it quite is quite no longer ordinary to conquer Beggar's feast or enable It Bleed, consequently the Brian Jones vote. they are nevertheless between the only bands which could bust out rockers and additionally turn around and make sluggish songs that don't suck. and by the Jones era, they actually proved the latter. The early sluggish ones like "coronary heart of Stone", "Play With fireplace","As Tears bypass by" and "Ruby Tuesday" are extraordinary, amid some extraordinary severe-power stuff like "nineteenth hectic Breakdown" and of direction "Paint It Black" For Mick Taylor, i admire Sticky palms and Exile on important St. as plenty as a results of fact the subsequent guy, yet previous the identify song, it quite is purely Rock n Roll did no longer have plenty going for it, so his era loses some factors there (quite plenty each thing in Jones's era replaced into gold). timber's era has considered them floundering at cases, yet he replaced into there for some ladies, that's quite plenty the definition of a "comeback album." I doubt every person in 1977 replaced into looking forward to a sturdy rock album like that out of them. And the main important help I relatively have for timber's era is their maximum modern-day attempt. I relatively love an more desirable Bang. i think of it quite is a much undermentioned album. They made the huge mistake of figuring out on lots of the weaker tracks for the singles, as a results of fact the album as an entire is quite extraordinary. They sound loose and relaxing, and the riffs are super. Aerosmith could take instructions on the thank you to be an growing to be older blues rock band from the bigger Bang album, as a results of fact the Stones do no longer sound old in any respect on it. They took quite some the classic rock worldwide to college on that one, and the prevalent public weren't even paying interest.
2016-10-17 15:19:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
reggae sucks
2006-12-02 13:22:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I just close my eyes and listen to the sounds of a drunk Belguim man.
2006-12-02 13:23:52 · answer #7 · answered by Illegals Are S*** 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because the people who wrote it were stoned
2006-12-02 13:22:55 · answer #8 · answered by mia61us 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because of the bass....
Blessings,
David
2006-12-02 13:24:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Jesus is Lord. There. Now it's religious.
2006-12-02 13:23:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋