Is this a good plan for the Middle East??

Question

You may say it is giving victory to the terrorists. Not many people know that a ton of governments have negotiated with terrorists in history behind the scenes, but the won't publicy state that. But you know what? I think, like a lot of people, that we are heading towards the End of The World. I know it sounds paranoind, but look in the Middle East. Crazy Iranian leader is building nuclear warheads to fire at Israel and North Korea is already possesing powerful weapons that could be used against the US, and we are screwed in Iraq. I see an imminent nuclear war, and so do many people, and not just paranoids or psychics. If the Middle East had a Palestinian State, what would they be fighting for? What is to lose by creating a Palestinian State? I would still support Israel, but I would attempt to work with leaders around the world to create a Palestinian State. Hey, conditions wouldn't get any worse. Please just state why I'm wrong or right and don't be rude. This is what I believe

Answer 1

You have apparently have never been to the middle east. There is a lot more fighting over there then just about a Palestinian State. Remember that Iraq invaded Kuwait; another Muslim country and that had nothing to do with your idea. And when and if Iraq falls when we depart it will become the host nation for an Iranian government.

The end of the world is eventually coming but I doubt it will be in a nuclear holocaust in my life time...not a pessimist.

Answer 2

The fact of the matter is that we have a written alliance with Israel. Since America rose to the status of the only remaining Super Power in the world on the backs of our alliances, it would be foolhardy to think that we could readily abandon an alliance. If we break one, many more will follow.

If you're worried about nuclear, investigate the Pakistan and Indian friction. Both have long range nuclear missiles. Both are itching to use them against each other. The threat we're facing is nothing like what they have to deal with.

Answer 3

those look extra like objectives than a plan. Like Bush had no plan in Iraq, purely objectives. the challenge including your "plan" is a topic obvious in many protection rigidity, courting and agency "plans". you have not any plans in any respect. How do you purely create thousands and thousands of jobs in one day or in a three hundred and sixty 5 days. the united states has a 5% unemployment fee that is turning out to be. If the most stronger military contained in the international - the united states - can not defeat the resistance communities, militias and demise squads in Iraq, how do you anticipate the Iraqi authorities and its protection rigidity to do it after the authorities inherited a separated countries that is bombed out and depleted. Sorry, that is not any plan. that is extra like a imaginative and prescient. a reliable imaginative and prescient. yet, no plan.

Answer 4

Hey, I want a country too! I'll call it the Nation of Getoffamylawn.

I'll build it right in your neighborhood, where your house is. I hope you don't mind, because I consider this my nation now. Oh, you don't like that? Well, I'm going to start a war over it.

How would YOU like it? (Grin - see where I'm going?)

Consider the link below: The problem is not that the land isn't plentiful, it's land that is owned by a different culture that has very little land to begin with.

They're fighting to overtake land that isn't theirs, and the objection is that land is considered Holy Land by thier inhabitants. Kind of like me living in your kitchen.

Hahaha, horrible examples, but I hope they make the point.

Answer 5

There will be no peace until the Palestinians get their land back from the Israelis

Answer 6

i believe it is none of our business over there anyway, those idiots over there can just kill each other off as far as im concerned