English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-02 05:26:08 · 10 answers · asked by cooper 2 in Politics & Government Military

10 answers

I assuming you are talking about the US. I don't think they would right now. Its true that they've got a nuke pointed at our head, but we've also got a few nukes pointed at their head also. if north korea decides to nuke the US, i'm not sure what will happen, we've got enough trouble as is in iraq. but we'd have some allies to help us out. Also its not sure the nuke would be aimed at us. It could be aimed at some neighboring country like China.

2006-12-02 05:37:54 · answer #1 · answered by アルバート みつるぎ- Albert Mitsurugi 3 · 0 0

North Korea is looking for handouts again. Naturally the liberals will rush there and hand out Our tax dollars. When will liberals learn strength obtains results. Discussions just waste time. The liberals tried buying their way before with N. Korea. Look how well that happened. Of course Nut cases like Carter think it worked. The people in N. Korea will starve or freeze quicker by their government spending it's resources on weapons instead of buying food. Korea is thinking like the radical terrorist. It is better to die attacking than starving.

2006-12-02 05:32:26 · answer #2 · answered by mr conservative 5 · 0 0

Not bomb the U.S. but could bomb Japan or South Korea. Actually, no country would dare use the bomb against the U.S. We may be bogged down in Iraq but our Air Force can fly anywhere in the world non-stop.

2006-12-02 05:31:57 · answer #3 · answered by me_worry? 4 · 1 0

The threat of a nuke from NK hitting the US is not very likely...They may hit Japan or SK, what is scary is that they have Biological agents that make the ebola virus look like a common cold. That is the scary advent upon the entire world.

2006-12-02 06:54:42 · answer #4 · answered by TAHOE REALTOR 3 · 0 0

I doubt united statesa. will stick there noses in Syria on account that there is not any longer something to thieve like oil, and besides the fact that if it quite is for a peacekeeping concern they gained't danger sending troops as a results of fact it will be yet another conflict between militia forces and there is not any plan for a attack. bear in mind they suffered slightly in iraq. With Iran, its doubtful yet its extra obtainable on account that Iran experienced earthquakes toppling its militia so the human beings could get there palms on the oil there, inspite of the undeniable fact that it will be heavily risky to attack a great ability even after the earthquakes bear in mind that they have got Russia as its best chum and it may re act severe to this occasion as a results of fact they Iran and Russia border one yet another so if a missile impacts the russian border then this could be taken as a act of conflict. And as for North Korea it won't ensue Kim is attempting to coach off and in the event that they are going to the two have interaction in a conflict which I doubt united statesa. will go through extraordinarily as a results of fact they wont have the means to attack with missiles plenty on account that its best chum SK could be affected and neither united statesa. desires to invade a rustic it quite is waiting for them, bear in mind they took severe casualties in Vietnam by a unprofessional military like viet cong yet whilst they try the Koreans they're going to combat a severe and huge militia as a results of fact it has protective positions waiting, so united statesa. won't danger it.

2016-10-17 14:59:31 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

from what i heard. but i also heard that bush and Korea made a truce together. so i have a red dot on my forehead about that one.

2006-12-02 05:28:56 · answer #6 · answered by fishyinmytank 3 · 0 0

they're going to try to bomb everyone.

2006-12-02 05:33:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i highly doutb it after all they know you will nuke them back (mutually assured destruction)

2006-12-02 08:41:24 · answer #8 · answered by supremecritic 4 · 0 0

us being the uk...no, us being the USA....not yet, but maybe in the future

2006-12-02 05:30:19 · answer #9 · answered by jd_elegance 2 · 0 0

ONLY if they are stupid enough!

2006-12-02 05:33:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers