English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If i ran for president at less i could do good the laws would have to stop,are forfarthers fought for freedom and now we have carpetbaggers in offices.did you know that you have to be rich to run for office ha what a joke.i dont care what kind of person in office as long as he or she works for the people,the problem we have is in congress and our goverment they need to help our people instead of helping other lands we should be free not comminest in our country yet you cant even go by the consintution any more that is bad the attorneys making the laws have to stop this should be the people vote if you vote for it then it should be law not them and making all money in return kand why dont we start having councels from all around the wold from each country and unite with them and see if we can have a plane of action fore the whole world no more passports all people one nation not a seprate nation,and what about your home after you buy it why should you steal pay taxes on it ?

2006-12-01 23:54:08 · 15 answers · asked by glenn_gregg24 1 in Politics & Government Government

15 answers

You should totally run.

2006-12-01 23:55:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I would like to have a President that has a grasp on grammer. Someone hasn't been paying attention at school. What country would you be running for anyways? The U.S. already has a President that doesn't know the language.

And if your asking other people's view if you should run you already lost. I want a President who doesn't need acceptance from people to run for office.

And that New World Order view about no nations looks good on paper but then again so does Communism.

2006-12-02 00:04:40 · answer #2 · answered by agnostic thinker 2 · 0 0

Are you kidding? John Adams, our *2d* President, replaced into George Washington's Vice-President. Being Veep has long been considered as a demonstration which you have been going to run for the ideal activity, particularly after Presidential term limits have been extra.

2016-10-17 14:47:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You're pretty much gonna have to learn how to spell if you're going to be President... Sorry! And, take off the scuba mask, or else when you're giving a speech, you'll sound even DUMBER than George Bush.

2006-12-01 23:56:01 · answer #4 · answered by Stretchy McSlapNuts 3 · 1 0

I think you opinion is good but you will face many problems and you will be a president you will change the all the rules and you will do for adults so many things

2006-12-02 00:06:50 · answer #5 · answered by ansh 1 · 0 0

OK I'll vote for you if you go to school,take some English classes and work on your spelling.

2006-12-02 00:06:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I would vote for you. You'd do much better than Hillary Clinton.

2006-12-01 23:59:12 · answer #7 · answered by Cuddly Lez 6 · 0 0

Well, since you obviously can't spell and your grammar and punctuation are sorely lacking.............you would probably make a great president!
For example it would be OUR forEfathers.
It looks really bad when you use ARE when it should be OUR.
And it would be "at LEAST" not "less".
Capitalize your I when referring to yourself.
Capitalize the first letter of your sentence.
The word is GOVERNMENT. (A President should know that).

2006-12-01 23:55:15 · answer #8 · answered by BlueSea 7 · 1 1

Save your money for something worthwhile.

2006-12-02 00:11:55 · answer #9 · answered by WC 7 · 0 0

President of???
who are you???
never heard of your name yet...
you wont win the race....

2006-12-02 00:00:36 · answer #10 · answered by bugi 6 · 0 0

learn to spell before you run k.

2006-12-02 00:15:16 · answer #11 · answered by jtaylor 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers