English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

I think a comparison can be made between the dilemma of Prince Hamlet and the king of modern Physics - Stephen Hawkins. A few years ago Hawkins said that the mass of the universe is disappearing. It is draining out of the universe into annihilation through black holes dotted in their billions across the whole expanse of the universe. This was a big claim that sent shockwaves through out the scientific community of the world. The fundamental requirement for science to come up with an explanation about the construct or the function of the universe is that it knows to some degree of certainty the total mass of the universe. But if the mass itself, or the universe all but disappearing then nothing can be formulated ever as the theory of everything. Then latter on Hawkins furthered his research and came up with another theory not refuting the previous one but add to it by saying that the mass of the universe is disappearing through black holes, aright, but it is reappearing somewhere into a parallel universe. So the total mass in existence is constant thus upholding the law of conservation of mass and energy that the entire body of scientific know is based upon.

The universe Prince Hamlet inhabits has a dilemma too. The entire noble existence of the prince of Denmark is being drained away in vain into a ‘black hole’ of his acute inner psychological conflict - his ambivalence relationship with his mother, idealisation of his murdered father and his supernaturally conceived responsibility for the execution of vengeance for the death of his father upon his treacherous and incestuous uncle, ‘the damned smiling villain’, all create a universe that is exclusively experienced only by Hamlet. His procrastination in exacting the vengeance, the tragic flaw in the protagonist, of his father's deaths ultimately leads him to his own tragic demise alongside the death of his loved ones – all universe is gone. The nature of the powerful psychological black hole in the mind of the noble prince, I thinking, Professor Hawkins would be able to understand, as he himself is not unaware of the toils and troubles of the life one has to endure so bravely and productively.

2006-12-01 22:42:52 · answer #1 · answered by Shahid 7 · 0 0

Gee, maybe. I guess he would have the largest vocabulary access in the world, and when you have that, you also have good word use, grammatical skills, and knowledge of sentence structure. He possibly could if he put his mind to it.

2006-12-01 22:09:37 · answer #2 · answered by Cold Fart 6 · 0 0

His bodily limitations would be a disaster on stage. He is also rather busy with cosmology.

2006-12-01 23:02:13 · answer #3 · answered by e==mc2 2 · 0 0

He seems mild enough to me, and he's probably a slow burner .....

2006-12-02 01:40:09 · answer #4 · answered by Cassandra 3 · 0 0

do you not think he would be very hard to smoke?

2006-12-01 22:12:21 · answer #5 · answered by armaghmadman 2 · 0 0

no

2006-12-02 19:21:01 · answer #6 · answered by Hope 2 · 0 0

no

2006-12-01 22:17:11 · answer #7 · answered by Father Jack 2 · 0 0

To....
Be....
Or....
(Pause)
Not...
(long pause)
To
Be
Audience: Get on with it you mong.

2006-12-01 22:09:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers