That means 5 Billion plus have to go, why should you be allowed to stay? Or, who is top of your list to go? We can start with Michael Jackson lol
2006-12-01 19:35:06 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Michael Jackson is definitely on the top of the list to stay!! The world would be a crappy place without him!! On the top of the list to go should be Eminem!!
♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥
2006-12-02 01:25:18 · answer #1 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Seems to me like it is capable of supporting 6 billion quite well, except that many people are greedy, and refuse to share. But I wouldn't worry, though, there is bound to be some pandemic soon
2006-12-02 03:38:25 · answer #2 · answered by judy_r8 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yep i agree, jackson first all the other pervs can follow, hey at least they'll b entertained, not!
OJ simpson, b4 he writes another spaff book.
b'liar next and a few of his power-hungry, moral-less bunch
bush
cheney
oh hell how about the whole bush administration, rumsfeld can lead?
any remaining perverts
and all the scum-bag gluttonous and avarice worshipping politicians hanging around.
2006-12-02 03:42:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
This is all too true. As a supposedly intelligent species, humans have been multiplying like dumb rabbits.
2006-12-02 03:37:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
hey why don't we add some more and really have another big bang with people being scattered all over the solar system>
2006-12-02 03:40:20 · answer #5 · answered by livinhapi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not true. There's plenty of resources to go around. It's just that we don't distribute them well. Shame on us.
2006-12-02 03:39:22 · answer #6 · answered by drshorty 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hmm
2006-12-02 03:42:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes.................
2006-12-02 03:38:05 · answer #8 · answered by Akshat Jayaswal 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋