Basically you US bashers are saying that the BUSH created 9/11?

Question

because the American lifestyle was too much for thos Muslim piolts to handle.....I personally don't believe all this staging 9/11 bullshit, I just think it was a loop hole in our airtravel system that now today we can thank is tighter and more harder to committ a hijacking. So why you idiots all think 9/11 was staged?????

Answer 1

Bush and his compadres knew that Al Qaeda was going to attack. Why didn't he do something about it?

Answer 2

It is possible that it was staged. There was a book written by an ex-CIA agent called 'Behold a Pale Horse' that described plans to use aerial assaults to destroy the World Trade Center and begin a war that would secure American style politics in places of the world that generally would never accept it. The concept of being the first to successfully establish a New World Order was the intended outcome. It described a pre-cursor to the events of 9/11 that would beef up land and building securities but leave it wide open for air attacks. A bombing in the same building that would not collapse the structure, but instead would create panic and generate fear. This book was written in 1989. Published around the same time. These were direct quotes and some paraphrasing of CIA documents to which the agent had access before he retired.
If it 9/11 was staged, it wasn't Bush's fault and he probably had little to nothing to do with it at. It's the CIA. But I'm torn on that issue, I think it's feasible that it is the case, and feasible that it's not.

Answer 3

Well, it's not that 9/11 was staged, but have you actually read the commission report?

Apart from the discreptancies, I think a lot of Bush bashers are not mad at the 9/11-

It's the fact that Bush invaded Iraq, and if you KNOW about 9/11,
it had NOTHING to do with Iraq.

Afghanistan was the "suspect."

And if you are so angry about Bush bashers, you also then, know that the whole Bush family is heavily vested in the weapons defense industry and oil. Right?

I think you should do a little research on why people are upset.

There is no Al-Quaida. That term was coined by Bush.

So, yes, the public is going to be upset.

And also, if you study science, which I don't think you do or you would have seen, that the only way a building (scientifically speaking) can fall the way the towers fell, they would not have fallen straight down. Compared to many buildings that were on fire or suffered damage from the earthquakes, there is no way, unless it was specifically targeted, for the building, let alone TWO buildings, to fall parrallel and straight down.

Compare the buildings to those that are demolished.
So, whether it was staged or not, the buildings were definitely planted with bombs, but to say Bush did it, I don't know.

But I can tell you for sure, those two planes had nothing to do with the end demise.

I think you should look at the theories and take yourself out of the angry aspect, and really look at it from another point of view, then you can make your decision.

My brother went to Iraq, but not because of 9/11-but because of Saddam.

But Bush has you believing they are "terrorists" when they had nothing to do with 9/11. Again, it was supposedly Afghanistan.

We have killed so many more people over nothing in Iraq. More than what 9/11 did to us.

So you can love it or hate it, but it's not about common sense or being brainwashed. Too many people was FOX news, even after Murdock was caught with the memo. So you tell me.

Answer 4

Obviously you are not well informed and your question is phrased in a very insultive manner which indicates to me that you are a highschool or junior high school kid who is uninformed . Bush has a lot to answer for on 9/11 as would any president who was in power during such an incident. Too many underanswered questions still exist.Why did the building implode? Since steel does not melt at the internal temp that the building achived how did it colaspe? Why did it "free fall"? Why were the bomb sniffing dogs removed prior to the attacks, as in one week before?

Answer 5

Bush was too busy reading My Pet Goat, remember?

But I guess you never saw all those warnings by foriegn intelligence agencies, warnings from our own agency, the planes flying out Bin Laden's relatives, the PNAC document calling for a new Pearl harbor, Operation Northwoods, the put options on the American Airlines, the wargames during 9/11, and Bin Laden being reported dead to name a few. There are legitmate questions regarding 9/11. To dismiss it with partisan crap is juvenile and ridiculous. Why did we spend mor emoney investigating a ******* then investigating the worst attack on American soil?

Answer 6

Conspiracy Hobbyists.
They look at video of WTC on 911 and see explosions and conclude explosives.
I look at the same video and conclude hot gas accumulating in closed space and finally igniting.
And they watch the video over and over.
Straining for detail.
Then they start seeing things.
Fog monsters.

There have always been those "types" around.
Used to hear them on Late Night AM Radio on programs like ART BELLS.
Which I have listened to in the past.
Not my kind of radio show.

excerpt from link
Bell's original program in Las Vegas was a political call-in talk radio show, but he tired of the format, believing there were too many such programs, especially in the wake of Rush Limbaugh's massive success.

Thus, Bell abandoned conventional political talk and began highlighting topics such as gun control and conspiracy theories. This led to a significant success in his overnight ratings. However the main focus of his show shifted significantly after the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. Many in the media did not want to be blamed for inciting the militia/anti-government actions like the bombing. Afterwards, Bell discussed offbeat topics like the paranormal, occult knowledge, UFOs, protoscience, and pseudo-science. If one were to read a transcript of Bell's early 1990s shows (and not hear the voice), they might not recognize it as the same show with which he later found widespread success. Gone is the militia talk, replaced with UFOs and ghosts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_Bell

The more Articulate "Conspiracy Hobbyists" wound up on spooky radio
shows.
The less articulate had no place to throw in their two cents until the INTERNET came along.
Now they have Web sites and forums and chat rooms.

Answer 7

You've answered your own question when you say that you "personally don't believe all this staging 911 b s, I just think it was a loop hole, etc etc."
because others "personally think" what they want to think also.Some of the "theories" aren't even all out there yet.
Another answerer here is absolutely correct. There are many unanswered questions. Just because MSNBC or Fox 5, or CNN report news doesn't always mean they report accurately. And just because they or others say there was no conspiracy doesn't necessarily mean that there wasn't.
So we wait. and we wait. And someday the truth will out. It always does.
In the interim, no one here is an idiot. When the truth is known, it may well be you who has been made out a fool.

Answer 8

Very few people believe it was staged. Its mostly people who are just plane nuts. THERE IS NO REAL PROOF THAT IS WAS. Its like some people believe that elvise is still alive. Same thing. I did notice a lot of muslims are saying it was staged. Bin laden did it and he stated his reason. He also staged other attacks on us forces. Also said that he will attack us directly pre 9/11 and his followers said that the cofin bussines will go up in the us pre 9/11. I think you have to be STUPID STUPID STUPID to believe it was staged. I mean the goverment would be able to stage 9.11 but wouldnt take down those stupid websites? Wouldnt kill a few more people to cover it up?? The fact we half to even talk about it is stupid.

Answer 9

liberals are still mad at the fact that bush won the election twice and have been doing everything possible to unseat him. so they have pinned every bad thing that has happened on earth to him. remember how they tried to lay both the tsuami and katrina tragedies on him??

i don't believe in this conspiracy crap either. i mean use your common sense. how could bush possibly pull it off?? in less than a year, how could he get thousands of FBI agents, firefighters, demolition experts, CIA operatives, government officials, and muslim hijackers to go along with his plan without someone coming forward??

how could he have convinced military and government workers to stay in the pentagon and allow themselves to be blown to pieces ??

plus, why would bush purposely destroy the economy and murder thousands of people and allow our landmarks to be destroyed if he wanted to be known as a good president?

all this conspiracy crap is just mental masturbation for pissed off liberals who want to regain power. there is no physical proof that 9/11 was staged. only a few websites with a bunch of "theories" . if there was really a possibility that he did it, he would be under investigation.

Answer 10

Have you seen any evidence that verifies the Govt story about 9-11?

Answer 11

I love this theory, I noticed that now that the smoke has cleared, and continues to clear, the finger of blame points more and more toward "BUBBA CLinton" not reacting to threats, ya know

Bombing of the American Embassy in Africa- Clinton did nothing !

USS COLE gets hit in Yemen - Clinton did nothing !

1st attack on the towers- Clinton didn't even come to NY

So If you want to talk about "KNOWING IT WAS COMING IN ADVANCE" Clinton's ya man !

History will prove 911 to be Clinton's fault, and Bush a GOOD PRESIDENT,

Please mention your theory some more, because now anyone who does suggest your theory, is branded a "LUNATIC".