English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

There isn't one. You can flip off anyone you want and the president, being a public figure, has to take more abuse than anyone. One can make the argument that, if you know someone has a disposition to mental problems and you do something to aggrevate those mental problems knowing that your action will aggrevate said problems, you could be liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress. But this doesn't apply to the President.

2006-12-01 18:14:32 · answer #1 · answered by Erik B 3 · 0 0

Seditious libel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seditious_libel

Yeah, courts found it unconstitutional before, but nowadays -- who knows?

2006-12-02 01:24:06 · answer #2 · answered by hq3 6 · 0 0

somethin about cruelty to retards....

2006-12-02 01:10:48 · answer #3 · answered by crockoshithunter 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers