Wouldnt it of been more mathmaticaly & phylosicfuly correct in the equasion as to the answer ?
2006-12-01 15:19:36 · 4 answers · asked by rawknjeep 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
m = E/c^2 is the same, but that's kind of trivial. Not sure if that's what you mean or not.
2006-12-01 15:25:14 · answer #1 · answered by gregj_uva 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Each letter stands for something so to divide as a means of representing it would be false, because it would not accurately depict the constants each letter stands for.
2006-12-01 15:35:26 · answer #2 · answered by silverkelz 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whatever are you talking about? You can't even spell his name correctly and you're claiming that his equation is incorrect?
Do the dimensional analysis. Both sides come out as joules.
2006-12-01 15:23:28 · answer #3 · answered by arbiter007 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well if what i know ithink if start with multiplying then go to division then you would be doing the opposite .....right?
2006-12-01 15:45:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋