free country here in the USA, therefore he can do and get away even with murder, funny the only thing we can't away with is not paying taxes to the USA government.
2006-12-01 13:21:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
OJ has always maintained his innocence and this hypothetical book should be available and people have a CHOICE whether to read it or not. OJ is likely not being narcissistic and a great portion of the book is probably defending himself against false allegations. Here's a few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his extreme racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand (wrong size).
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see the rumored large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to say with absolute certainty that this man is guilty.
Read this:
http://members.aol.com/CntrbndMag/oj.html
One of the World's top forensics scientists Dr. Henry Lee who worked on the case during the trial and saw the evidence, wrote a very good book "Cracking Cases" and makes some interesting scientific points about OJ not being the one who did this unfortunate crime.
2006-12-01 23:23:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by sunshine25 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
OJ won the criminal charges so he didn't go to prison . OJ lost the civil case against him made by both the in-laws and the family of the man he killed as well . in ruling the judge in the civil matter made a ruling that OJ could not sell a book or a movie about the murders and was forbidden from gaining any monetary profit from the murders.
so the law is that no he may not profit from his actions.
2006-12-01 21:29:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The publisher withdrew the book, it was a bad and cynical idea and they got their tuppence. Having said that OJS would have got no money from the sale because it was all confiscated by the Civil suit that he lost.
2006-12-01 21:22:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mimi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
OJ is crazy as hell because he is breaking the code. His case wasn't about black or white ,but money and fame. He is the type of dude you would never want to know you did anything wrong. You would have to beat him to keep his mouth close. He is just try to find a way to get some money.
2006-12-01 21:25:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by TMAC 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
The book was cancelled, but....
"Allowed to profit" - yes, he wasn't convicted of murder
"Right that he profit" - No it isn't right that he profit
He wouldn't have profited from anything in my pocket.
2006-12-01 21:22:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Cerdic 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
OJ is a murdering scumbag. NO profits for killers!
2006-12-01 21:21:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Joey Bagadonuts 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Simpson should not be allowed to live. He's a murderer, plain and simple - and just because a naive jury was conned into letting him go free doesn't mean he's innocent. Simpson is a psychopath, and he WILL kill again. Maybe the next time the glove will fit, and a jury will not acquit. Whatever happens, Simpson will surely rot in hell for all eternity once he faces his maker. -RKO-
2006-12-01 21:21:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
he can profit but he still has a 32 million dollar civil judgement, so techinicaly tthe profits should go to the Goldman Family whose son he murdered.
2006-12-01 21:53:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by 79vette 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
N. O. ! As far as I am concerned the book is an admittence of his guilt. He did it and if the world wasn't watching him so closely he would've killed again by now. He truely is a megalomaniac his ego is too big for his own good. Gives me the shivers.
2006-12-01 21:25:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by jupitor 3
·
0⤊
1⤋