2006-12-01 11:43:27 · 15 answers · asked by ast5792 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I believe a special commission would have to determine that.
The full breadth of the crimes will be a challenge to 'prove' in court. How can we get more people to see what they are afraid to see.
http://www.justicefor911.org/
http://patriotsquestion911.com/
2006-12-01 11:54:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
You're a retard right ? What War Crimes has he commited, been charged with and convicted of ? Same questions apply to the crimes agains't humanity and America ?
What would be the appropriate sentnce for Clinton selling the Chinese technology that allows them to hit us with Balistic Missles now hummm ?
2006-12-01 12:00:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Life in Prison, no parole. The Maximum sentence under current international sentencing guidelines.
Yo it's me, the war in Iraq was not sanctioned by the UN security council. Even if it was, the handling of the war would still leave plenty of room to allow for charges of war crimes.
2006-12-01 11:50:53 · answer #3 · answered by The Big Box 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
careful which include your questions, you're able to easily teach your lack of expertise of cutting-edge international events. could the Obama administration circulate to reformatory for the 1st assassination of a U. S. Citizen without due technique as assured interior the form? Are you stable with what he did? I say neither could circulate to reformatory. They have been the two keeping the voters of the U. S., the 1st accountability of the place of work of President. have been they the two efficient? definite, there have been no considerable assaults on American soil on condition that 9-11.
2016-12-10 20:04:54 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The U.N. Security Council sanctioned it, so no grounds for war crimes, plus we have not violated any ICRC rules.
Sorry, but I know the the rules of your beloved U.N. and the Geneva Conventions (International Committee of the Red Cross).
2006-12-01 11:47:27 · answer #5 · answered by Yo it's Me 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
For one killing, people have been given life sentences and death. Killing 3000 of our best soldiers for no reason. Causing genocide of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis, who did no harm to Bush or America. A reasonable sentence is not even imaginable.
2006-12-01 12:21:28 · answer #6 · answered by ramshi 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He should have to be locked in a little room for the rest of his life with his only form of entertainment would be to listen to his own speeches. Day in day out, all George W. Bush, all the time.
2006-12-01 11:56:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
2 pairs standard issue military desert camo fatigues
1 pair of combat boots.
4 pairs of socks
1 duffle bag
1 M-16
6 live round ammo clips
3 live ammo fragment grenades
1 survival knife
1 week worth of desert rations
1 way transport to Baghdad
2006-12-01 11:53:37 · answer #8 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
His punishment should be that he gets sentenced to stare at a picture of a cat in a bathing suit, stepping out of a swimming pool. If I had to stare at that picture day in and day out, it would drive me crazy.
2006-12-01 11:46:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
In that remote scenario maybe he should go to a place that in his opinion doesn't violate any international standarts/human rights
Guantanamo.
However... that won't happen... People probably won't realize how damaging his actions have been for another 50-100 years.
2006-12-01 11:48:34 · answer #10 · answered by santapatita 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋