Why are diamonds so important to girls/women?

Question

If your fiance gets you a 1/4 carat diamond does it mean he loves you less as compared to a 1 carat diamond? Since we are in an age of equality between men and women, shouldn't the women be buying diamond engagement rings for men or maybe a diamond watch or something?

Answer 1

yes they should and tiffanys has a nice mens collection also...lol

Answer 2

They care because diamonds symbolise a pure and everlasting love - obviously it is a big deal to be given a diamond.

Personally I would prefer a ruby as an engagement ring, as that means the same thing, but with great passion added to the mix. Also rubies are prettier than diamonds, which look sort of cold to me.

And yes, I think the woman should buy the man an engagement present in return - probably a gold watch if he didn't want to wear an engagement ring.

Answer 3

It turns out that the custom of a man giving a woman a diamond ring came about because of an advertising campaign. There was an interesting article in Time Magazine that covers it. Big diamond companies such as DeBeers are responsible for this notion that a man has to spend 2 months salary on a diamond ring. I posted the link under source. I hope this helps.

Answer 4

No, it doesn't mean he doesn't love her. It means he can't afford a bigger diamond or doesn't want to pay a lot for a piece of jewelery.

I do not want a diamond since DeBeers has artificially inflated the price of diamonds by stockpiling most of the known diamonds in the world.

Also, there is a lot of torture and killing related to diamonds coming out of Africa. They are called Conflict Diamonds and are not supposed to be bought by diamond dealers. However, since they thrown in with other diamonds it is hard to distinguish them.

I guess if she asks the man to marry her, she should buy a ring or watch for you. Usually women wait for the man to finally decide to marry her.

I wonder what same sex couples do? I am going to ask that question?

Answer 5

Diamonds are highly overrated, and the source of much fighting about "not spending enough,"
In this day and age, there are SO many more important ways to spend those thousands of dollars. And, for those who are more philanthropic - that money could go to a favorite charity.
I don't own any idiamonds. I don't want any diamonds. The CZ's in recent years have become so authentic looking - why would anyone need a real one.

Answer 6

Buying a diamond for a woman means a lots and she will automatically tell her friends to show off and let them know hey my man loves me. Because when a man buy something expensive for a woman it details DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER.

Answer 7

Women change their last name. That's what I essentially felt the trade off was.

DeBeers have done the world's greatest job of marketing in convincing girls they want big diamonds. If you get a good diamond that is cut well so it sparkles well, it shouldn't matter. Many diamonds are cut poorly so they are bigger, but the poor cut makes them not sparkle.

Answer 8

reliable question, and mutually as that's definitely the groom's day as lots because of the fact the bride's (or, as somebody else mentioned, arguably the mum and dad' day to 3 quantity), I agree that the theory of its being the bride's day lingers. i think of there are various stuff in contact. one element this remains real for many weddings is that the bride is dressed extra extravagantly than every person else, and for this reason gets extra interest. i think the stereotype probable is real that, on the completed, women care extra approximately how the way they gown is perceived via others. on the completed, people come to a marriage looking forward to the bride to look eye-catching and to be superbly dressed. i do no longer think of the comparable is extremely envisioned of the groom. So there is that element, yet i do no longer think of it is each thing. the different element is extra historic. traditionally i think of a guy replace into already meant to be the two self sustaining, or shifting in the direction of independence, on the factor of marriage. The bride, although, could routinely have been residing along with her mum and dad nonetheless, and her marriage could sign an extremely super replace in her existence: she'd have a clean homestead, and she or he'd have duty over a clean enjoyed ones (in the event that they have been wealthy sufficient to handle to pay for servants). the guy, on the different hand, could already have left homestead, could stay in the comparable homestead, and could maximum probable proceed in the comparable line of artwork. So marriage marked a variety of independence for the bride, even nonetheless fairly she replace into merely changing one form of dependency with yet another. those are my suggestions besides. ---- @Sofia: you assert that the bride isn't the main necessary individual on her wedding ceremony day, and yet you in addition to could say this is the day whilst all the attention is on her. i think of there is somewhat a contradiction there. the factor is: why is all the attention on her? that's what makes it her day. and that i agree that there are women (and a few adult adult males) whose wedding ceremony day is the main necessary day of her existence, yet no longer for all of them, fairly! are not we previous those days? yet you're stunning that the bride many times finally ends up doing most of the making plans, this is somewhat a shame fairly.

Answer 9

sorry...i don't care about diamonds....if i did get married, i'd definitely want my man to have a ring..but it wouldn't be diamonds , and i wouldn't want a flashy ring either

Answer 10

the amount you spend to a lot of women (NOT ALL) is related to how much you love them....