Without abortion, it would increase the amount of liberals, yes?
Increased liberals, increased welfare, yes?
More welfare, more of your taxes going to support said welfare, yes?
More taxes for welfare, less money for weapons and fighting terrorism.
Less money for fighting terrorism, they're in your back yard.
Is this what you really want?
2006-12-01 11:11:17 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I take it that wasn't a very popular question?
2006-12-01 11:17:05 · update #1
What's important is that other people are punished for the sake of the morally righteous...oops... I mean what's important is that young sexually active women take personal resposibility for all consequences of their entirely voluntary choices. This includes dying of infections from back alley abortions, leaving their children motherless and their own parents grief-stricken for life.
2006-12-02 00:17:11 · answer #1 · answered by Skip F 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
DEMOCRATS REFORMED WELFARE Florio in NJ in 1990 was the first Clinton followed federally in 96 The amount of welfare money spent and Welfare recipients has declined steadily since this bill was passed in 96
CORPORATE WELFARE HAS INCREASED
Such as the Oil companies receiving about 6 billion per year
EXXON made almost 40 billion in profits
we paid 3 dollars a gallon
the recently retired CEO of Exxon got a 400 mil retirement package
And EXXON received about 2 billion in Federal funds????????
or 1 week in Iraq
Medicaid which counts as part of the welfare budget increased spending by about 60 billion a year for the RX drug program
(which apparently saves Americans very little but makes a fortune for the drug companies their profit margin is actually larger then Oil)
We spend almost 1.5 billion a week in Iraq
about 200 million a day, over 8 million an hour
Imagine if we spent 8 million an hour fighting Al-queda and terrorism
2006-12-01 20:01:16 · answer #2 · answered by gdeach 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is true that nearly all of the children that are aborted are the children of liberals and many of them would be no smarter than their parents if allowed to grow but liberalism is more of an illness than a crime and hardly deserves the death penalty.
it is abortion that is the crime and it could be considered a capitol one if it were not a result of this illness and we do not punish those who do not appreciate the wrongfulness of their deeds. this is one of the charitable and tolerant principles of conservatism.
2006-12-02 02:42:33 · answer #3 · answered by karl k 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You assume a lot in that a liberals children are liberal. Few of my friends vote the way their parents vote. It ruins the whole thought - well even more ruined!
2006-12-01 19:16:07 · answer #4 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Makes no sense at all!!!! Trying to justify murder in the form of a "botched joke" is sick!!!!
At least the child will be born to make it's own decisions!!!! As of right now the unborn have no voice!!!!!!
2006-12-01 19:16:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
God gave us free will.
Some choose evil, or to be liberals.
But who are we to take away the choice?
I know that applies to more than one choice, but I just thought I'd throw it out there...
2006-12-01 21:00:04 · answer #6 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dude man I live in the motel behind the truck stop.
Like I don't have a back yard Dude.
2006-12-01 19:14:22 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Your assumption that its just liberals who get abortions is really quite funny.
2006-12-01 19:14:18 · answer #8 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
YES! If enough liberals are born we can feed the babies to the terrorists and they will get so fat they can't fight! BAN ABORTION!!
2006-12-01 19:13:59 · answer #9 · answered by FEVER 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
There are things more important than money. Funny how it's the "Liberals" who seem to think that everything is about money.
2006-12-01 19:14:01 · answer #10 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋