Since the first one didn't work too well. In light of the British/KGB spy thing, why aren't we fascinated by the lack of concrete answers from 9.11? When Ken Starr investigated Clinton, we spent $40M. We barely spent $4M to investigate the worst tragedy in our national history. Where are the 395, gas station, and hotel tapes?
Someone should give the president oral sex so we can finally have "reason" to impeach him.
2006-12-01 10:50:39 · 9 answers · asked by M. 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
There has never been a "real" investigation, our money was spent on a "cover up": The 9/11 commission report is a joke. If there was a cover up, you can bet those involved in it, were involved in the crime as well. Criminals can't be expected to investigate themselves.
Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.
FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg
EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM
Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=
Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid. Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ
FORENSICS
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml
CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329
TESTIMONY
There is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon..."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=
This video, obtained by a public interest group, shows the top rear fin of an air craft hiding behind a call box: Whatever is hiding back there, is under 48 ft. long, to small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 ft. long.
http://www.clipaday.com/2006/05/pentagon_plane_crash_from_sept.html
MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA
2006-12-01 19:07:20 · answer #1 · answered by Joe_Pardy 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why isn't failure to uphold the Constitution and our laws sufficient reason? Why waste money to justify it? Not to mention, I'd just as soon our country not be dragged through more hotel scenes chasing its President.
However, I'm actually not in favor of impeachment. I think it is a waste of money. The guy will be gone in 2 years, anyhow.
--
Do you really think there was a 9/11 conspiracy? Because I saw live feeds and I really, really doubt it.
2006-12-01 18:53:57 · answer #2 · answered by DAR 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
the truth to that is obvious when you ponder how a jumbo jet fit in that hole we all saw carved into the pentagon, when we think back and try and remember what the plane debris looked like. or a that giant tail fin sticking out the roof would have made a much better photo shoot. when you look at everything, including the fact the cell phones don't work at 10,000 feet the truth begins to look scary. but poloticians don't lie, right? the CIA or FBI wouldn't lie. Bush certainly wouldn't lie, right?
people wil talk all day about how it's a stupid conspriacy, but they wont actually look at the evidence at judge for themselves
further more, most the supposed hijackers have been found alive
2006-12-01 19:10:36 · answer #3 · answered by sapace monkey 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Because people care more about nukes and Kim Jong II. This story is old history, why don't you just move on and stop complaining about the past?
2006-12-02 02:08:42 · answer #4 · answered by High-strung Guitarist 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why do we have to investigate what I saw on T.V.? Why must people like you buy into these mindless conspiracies? There's no deeper thing that has happened that we don't know of. Nice try i guess...
2006-12-01 19:04:54 · answer #5 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Do you really think Space Aliens did it instead of terrorists?
This must be a round-about way of defending the terrorists that actually did 9/11.
2006-12-01 18:54:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I posted 8 videos on my site if you want to know why.
Go to http://myspace.com/amandacarrie1
you will find alot of answers there.
2006-12-01 18:56:22 · answer #7 · answered by chara 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
why don't you spend your money on it i will keep mine
2006-12-01 22:20:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
1) we already spent money on three reports that all came to the same conclusions. Due to lack of security and foresight, we were infiltrated by 19 (almost 20) islamic extremist on a mission to strike at the heart of economy of the US headed by no more than 5 individuals, only 2 of which are still at large
2) The gas station video footage was released. The pentagon video was released. The hotel tapes were released. Welcome to 2006.
Debunking Sites:
http://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com/
http://www.911myths.com/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/research/4199607.html
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/158816635X/sr=8-1/qid=1155609077/ref=sr_1_1/104-6098036-7150331?ie=UTF8
http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/09/19/032851.php
http://www.slate.com/id/1008297/
http://www.debunk911myths.org/
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.jod911.com/
http://southerncrossreview.org/41/9-11.htm
http://www.lists.opn.org/pipermail/org.opn.lists.skeptix/Week-of-Mon-20060911/003261.html
http://www.politicalhobbyist.com/debunked/alexjones.html
http://www.lolinfowars.co.nr/
http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king911.htm
http://gradeonegadfly.blogspot.com/2006/10/loose-change-on-upper-east-side-part-i.html
http://www.911cultwatch.org.uk/
http://www.infoshop.org/texts/debunking911.html
http://internetdetectives.biz/case/loose-change
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5782277
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/911NutPhysics.HTM
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
http://antitruther.blogspot.com/
http://thedoc911.blogspot.com/
http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2006/09/01/news/conspiracy.php
Reports:
http://wtc.nist.gov/
http://www.house.gov/science/hot/wtc/wtcreport.htm
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/
http://www.9-11commission.gov/
http://www.house.gov/science/hot/wtc/wtc-report/WTC_ch2.pdf
http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2001/09/12/victim-capsule-flight77.htm
http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/article.cfm?archiveDate=10-07-01&storyID=7299
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110285.PDF
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml
http://www.asce.org/responds/
http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf
http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~astaneh/1-Services/Astaneh-Testimony%20Congress-March%206%20Final.pdf
http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/planes/defense/aviationnow_jumpstart.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3919613.stm
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/02/25/attack/main501989.shtml
http://www.designnews.com/index.asp?layout=article&articleid=CA6363426&industryid=43653
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc04.pdf
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc08.pdf
http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/2001/embryriddle092101.html
http://www.epa.gov/WTC/demolish_deconstruct/30wbroadway.htm
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925scene0925p2.asp
http://www.firehouse.com/news/2002/7/7_P911.html
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/11_APdc.html
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/norman.html
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/boyle.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28318-2005Apr5.html
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20011220shanksville1220p2.asp
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925sledzik0925p3.asp
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20011028flt93mainstoryp7.asp
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,212800,00.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34211,00.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/who/interview.html
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/index.htm
http://cryptome.sabotage.org/wtc-house.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/Banaciski_Richard.txt
http://www.icivilengineer.com/News/WTC/Fire.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A13766-2001Sep11
http://enr.construction.com/news/buildings/archives/030127.asp
http://www.navytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-467181.php
http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html
http://www.newhousenews.com/archive/story1a012802.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20040225213523/http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usflight232380680sep23.story
http://www.metallurgy.nist.gov/techactv2005/ar2005_safety.html#fire
http://www.911myths.com/html/ntsb_release_august_22_2006.html
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/terrorism/jan-june02/towers_5-1.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/US/11/02/wtc.remains.reut/index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20031026101720/http://www.arabianews.org/english/article.cfm?qid=12&sid=6
http://www.september11news.com/OsamaEvidence.htm
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2001/skyscrapers.pdf
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A19549-2001Sep24
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/M.A.Sweeney.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0%2C1300%2C550486%2C00.html
http://criticalthrash.com/terror.html
http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/11/28/60II/main319383.shtml
2006-12-01 18:56:15 · answer #9 · answered by arus.geo 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋