There are still some contested races, you just haven't followed it closely enough.
2006-12-01 09:58:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because all us commie-pinko-lib-dems always need something to complain about. Actually, there were some attempts at voter fraud and intimidation by small conservative communities, but there was nothing that would have a real impact. I requested a paper ballot where I vote and got one. I do not trust voting machines, not because of the possibility of fraud, but because there can be an error in the way the machine works.
2006-12-01 18:50:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Come on, that's an easy question to answer.
Just like when a reporter asked Al Gore "if Bush wins the popular vote, but loses in the electorate, what would you response be?"
Gore said Bush would just have to live with the fact that it is the electorate that makes that decision, and then went on to cry about it for an awfully long time.
2006-12-01 17:31:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by billy d 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
because they were shakin in their boots...and of course actions of a favorite American company like Ford doesn't help the Basic Family unit this past election either...Prior to the recent elections, Ford Motor Company sent an e-mail to their salaried employees pointing them to one of the most liberal, anti-family Web sites on the Internet. Ford urged their employees to go to Ballot.org for information on how to vote on issues including homosexual marriage. (Go to 4th paragraph where it says "check out the 2006 BISC Picks [our yes and no votes]." The Ford-recommended Web site urged voters to vote against constitutional amendments which defined marriage as being between one man and one woman in Arizona, Colorado, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.
Of the hundreds of voters guides Ford could have endorsed, Ford chose Ballot.org. Ford's endorsement of this site clearly indicates that Ford favored the positions promoted on Ballot.org. The Web site accused those who favored the marriage amendments of "extreme bigotry" and said the amendments were an "attack on marriage equality, civil unions and all domestic partnerships." This is the Web site Ford sent its employees to for information on how to vote.
2006-12-02 10:55:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by sosickiam 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The democrats were just preparing an excuse in case they did lose the house or senate or both. Since the voting machines were from Venezuela, and their president hates the president, I don't see why they would cry about the voting machines.
2006-12-01 17:29:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by zztopspin 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Republicans constantly cry about "activist judges." Yet George Bush was helped into office thanks to the activism by Chief Justice Rehnquist, and Justices O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas. Why don't Republicans cry about that? I do. It is why I am no longer a Republican.
It's a double-edged sword, fella.
2006-12-01 19:24:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
They did not cry about it, it was simply brought up. GW cried like a baby when the vote was mixed in the presidential race in Florida. So who was the baby then?
2006-12-01 17:24:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Thomas S 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Elections and political parties are merely illusions, because THIS secret and evil group has been in control of everything for far too long!...
http://www.rense.com/general58/suspre.htm
2006-12-04 10:09:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because of previous experience, especially in Fl.
2006-12-01 18:10:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by mstrywmn 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess Karl Rove is losing his touch... getting too fat and happy at those high cholesterol breakfasts he's so famous for!
2006-12-01 17:17:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Feathery 6
·
1⤊
0⤋