Is there only two ways road pricing can work morally without just basically pricing out the poorer motorists?
The only fair ways i can think of road pricing are by either;
1. Offering different tariffs to different income households (although that would in my opinion eliminate the point of road pricing)
2. Hypothecating the funds raised into public transport, thus improving public transport and this would not only get people who can't afford the prices onto public transport but also people who see it as a more attractive option which would be possible via hypothecation.
Are these the only fair ways to implement road pricing or am i being naive?
2006-12-01
08:29:54
·
4 answers
·
asked by
keith
4
in
Social Science
➔ Economics