English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Eurpeans began their expansion/exploration trhough the seas in the 1300 hundreds and now in 2006, over 500 years later they own more than 60 percent of the worlds natural resources, after Amerikkka was born as a all white nation they continue to conquer the world. the war in iraq, and historically every continent in this planet. European expansion commited genocides in the Americas, Asia , and Africa. Today the white leaders of the U.S. are commiting genocide in Iraq... how much longer?

2006-12-01 07:51:25 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Economics

10 answers

. Humans began taking over the world 200,000 years ago. Your population is where it is because in the past, it took over the land from some previous population.
. The expansionist practices of the Europeans stopped before world war 2. Since that time, Great Britain has relinquished its rule over India, Hong Kong, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, British Guyana, and possibly others I cannot think of.
. The French no longer rule Algeria. The Belgians no longer rule Congo.
. Capitalism is a good thing, in most ways. It rewards people for their efforts better than any other economic system. The only other system which claims to look after the common man is communism/socialism. Communism does not work because it does not take into account human nature. For communism to work, you need a nearly saintly population governed by saintly officials. Please name me another system which provides a better way of life for the average person tha that enjoyed by those in capitalistic countries.
. Develped nations have historically used up a greater share of the worlds natural resources because their industry created a demand for those resources, The resources often came from undevelped countries because the undeveloped countries had no industry and no use for those resources. European stock businessmen purchased those resources from those in the undeveloped countries who held themselves out to be the owners or stewards of those resources. If there is fault to be found in those business deals, the fault lies on both sides of the deal, and possibly more of it lies on those sellers of the resoucres who did not share the proceeds with the local population in their undeveloped country.
. It will be to your benefit and the benefit of those around you if capitalism cintinues to create opportunities and wealth for all in the world. Capitalism is s system which thrives on meeting the needs of others. If I sell you something you need, you and I are better off. If you sell me something I need, you and I are better off. So we both have incentive to meet the others needs. If my motivation to meet your need is some idealistic, altruistic utopian notion, you might not have your needs met, because I am only human.

2006-12-01 16:14:41 · answer #1 · answered by PoppaJ 5 · 2 0

Yeah dummass - what pappaJ said...


Seriously, Im not trying to be like nostradamus, but i believe this planet will see another 30-50 controlled conflicts before the one world government makes it's first public attempts to take over.

This will likely cause mass panic and polarization resulting in at least another 5 really big scale military conflicts with the most dominant forces eventually working together to exert control over everyone else.
Just guessing but likely another two hundred years after that of tense mistrust between the governed and the governers before we can finally start working together to destroy all military grade weapons. Some jackass will probably screw that up a couple of times before we seriously get it right.

Then finally we as a human civilization can begin spending the lion's share of this planets resources and our own labours on something besides destructive acts and war machines.

Basically another 1500 years give or take a couple centuries.
That's the right answer - please be giving me the points now.

2006-12-01 19:39:15 · answer #2 · answered by Nicholas J 7 · 0 1

Crawl back under your rock, troll. 95% of your "question" is nothing but rhetorical bullsh*t. And as for your comment about Iraq ~ you're correct that there's a genocide going on but you're wrong about who's doing the killing. Nearly ALL of the killings there are being committed by Muslim extremists against other Muslims.

2006-12-03 05:13:19 · answer #3 · answered by My Evil Twin 7 · 0 0

considering the impact of the chinese its hard to beleive that white supremacy is a real issue, and if captialism vs socialism as the democrats want it, takes over the world, it means that the end of social welfare states as ms. pelosi and clinton propose

2006-12-01 07:57:26 · answer #4 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1 0

Communism has not worked. The Chinese still persecute their people. Give us another solution, then we could answer.

2006-12-01 07:54:38 · answer #5 · answered by Lee 4 · 1 0

I'll give it another hour, then I'm going to the bar.

2006-12-01 08:11:27 · answer #6 · answered by faversham 5 · 0 0

Is this an example of liberal sophistication and nuance I always hear about?
.

2006-12-01 08:38:38 · answer #7 · answered by Zak 5 · 2 0

Everything is about money. These are the people that have it.

2006-12-01 08:32:07 · answer #8 · answered by Ha Ha Charade You Are................... 4 · 0 0

is that the reason i do not have a car

2006-12-01 08:20:13 · answer #9 · answered by STORMY K 3 · 1 0

You'll take it as long as we give it to you. And you'll like it.

2006-12-01 07:53:55 · answer #10 · answered by jveretto0804 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers