What if I told you everything you believed was wrong? Overpopulation, scarce resources, all false. Ok?

Question

How about the undeniable connection between abortion and breast cancer? What I am saying has nothing to do with an agenda. It just makes me feel terrible to see people being lied to. Anything I am saying can be investigated. What I am saying is true. Any evidence you provide to the contray was compiled by a biased organization. As they say, people may lie, but numbers don't.

Old school says I must provide proof to prove something isnt. Yet no one here can provide proof that it is. It seems that evidence is only required when someone says something you don't like. I bet if I came here with all the popular doomsday stuff you would be singing my praises even if I had nothing to back it up.

Answer 1

whatever u said is half truth

Answer 2

Well let me start by saying that I admire the level of commitment you have to your personal belief system.

That said. If you told me that, I'd tell you that you were wrong. I would tell you that you have been reading one side, exactly one side of something that isn't really even a debate, except in the minds of those who write the side you've been reading and/or listening to.

Then I would recommend that you do the following: Read the articles that I have linked below. If you have any questions after you have read the articles, obtain the actual studies that some of them reference, you can you know. Read them, study the numbers, graph them yourself, reference the originals to make certain the numbers weren't doctored. If you don't know how to do some of this, contact me by email - I have a colleague who teaches research methods, I'm sure she can recommend a guide book to help you. Think about what you learn from the studies. These are only the tip of the iceberg of course, metaphorically.

I would tell you that resources are in fact scarce, and that without nitrogen enriched fertilizer we cannot feed the people we have now ( http://www.alternet.org/story/26703/?comments=view&cID=47048&pID=47034) and many of them would never have existed to start with if we had not developed it.

I would tell you that I know you are a good person, and that I know you take the positions you take out of love for others.

Then, I think I would find myself crying. Wait, what is this moisture on my keyboard? I guess telling you what I would say is like saying it. for me I happen to be gay, but I raised two boys from their early teens. Both were straight, one of them died in an automobile accident coming home for the holidays two years ago. The other one is now married, and he and his wife are planning their first child. It is expected that we will be doing baby sitting when they need a break, we've already been informed of this. Fortunately Jonathan knows how to change diapers. But you see, I want my grandchildren to be strong and healthy -- I want them to live long lives, I want them to have healthy children (naturally if they are straight, and by adoption if they aren't), and though I'm loath to say it -- the real debate is whether or not that will be possible for them -- because the assertion you make, as well meaning as it is, is false -- and if your side wins the debate you've created, mankind may well end on this little planet, in the third arm of a rather nondescript galaxy, and never realize its greater potential.

That makes me sad for the whole race, and I am selfish enough to say, particularly for my own grandchildren and great grandchildren - who will suffer and die for an ideology that they will never even know or believe in.

It makes me unutterably sad.

God Bless You,

Reynolds
[e-mail]

Answer 3

Until you begin citing credible sources, you are not to be believed.