Which process would release energy from gold, fission or fusion? Which would release energy from carbon? From?

Answer 1

Were gold isotopes unstable (like uranium) and able to undergo spontaneous fission, or were a gold atom to be split by an energetic neutron or alpha particle, then energy would be released. This is the case with all elements heavier than iron, which is at the "bottom of the energy curve", so to speak, for elements. All elements with an atomic number equal to or smaller than iron (26) release energy when they are created (or fused) from lighter elements. This is also the case for carbon, with an atomic number of 6.

Answer 2

Carbon - fusion. Some stars are fusing carbon right now and getting lots of energy from it.

Gold - fission, maybe. It would be really hard to make gold fission and you would not get much energy from it, but in theory, if you could make it fission, it would release energy.

Answer 3

Some elements because of their configuration of neucleus or number of electrons in their orbitals are basically unstable[restless!] and therefore very active. Stable materials with fully satisfied electron/neuclear configuration are unsuitable for fission or fusion. Gold is therefore unsuitable for such reactions.Elements such as uranium are suitable for fission reaction and elements like Helium suitable for fusion reaction.[as in Sun]

Answer 4

definitely, i could think of that they are much less stressful to isolate than some sturdy factors. Take a bite of limestone, as an occasion. acquiring calcium from this is not any much less stressful than keeping apart oxygen in the air. Gases are oftentimes won from reactions with drinks/solids. Oxygen and hydrogen, as an occasion, is actual accrued via electrolysis of water (H2O) - in fact it replace into first defined remarkably early (1777) by hazard whilst Lavoisier replace into toying with acids. study to calcium, which took till 1808 and required a centred attempt.

Answer 5

RIGHT>>>