English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Many people on this site speak of God of Bible etc.
They don't know what is true philosophy.

2006-12-01 02:50:53 · 6 answers · asked by trizomik75 4 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

Precision : I know that true Philopsophy exists in America, but I think that Religion must stay in the church and musn't be blended with philosophy

2006-12-03 20:29:54 · update #1

And not only there are stupid but worse : chauvinist and paranaoiac ...

2006-12-03 20:32:06 · update #2

6 answers

If this is your thought process:

Premise 1: [owning a computer] -> [being intelligent]
Premise 2: [being intelligent] -> [knowing anything about philosophy]

Conclusion: [owning a computer] ->[knowing anything about philosophy]

Your argument fails because you can't even assume premise 1 is true at all.

Secondly, the assumption that all people on this site are "American" falls very short of being logical as you yourself are not "American."

Unfortunately, the study of philosophy isn't as important as it was before it spawned such studies as science, math, or psychology. While we live in a world where a movie like "The Matrix" can make millions of dollars off of an idea that Decartes came up with, most people tend not to remember the original thinkers that came up with the foundation for thought.

Unome, you just copied that from wikipedia...quit enforcing the world's view of lazy Americans and write your own thoughts!

2006-12-01 03:02:28 · answer #1 · answered by letum_ante_dedecus 3 · 1 0

True American philosophy is not, in gereral, concerned with theological concerns at all. However, it is a little difficult to characterize the philosophy practiced in American as just one school. One of the most important relativity early schools of American philosophy were William James and the Pragmatists.

As a philosophical movement, pragmatism originated in the United States in the late 1800s, with the thought and works of Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, John Dewey, and George Herbert Mead figuring most prominently in its overall direction. These originators, however, typically point back to the influence of several earlier thinkers, with especial mention of Immanuel Kant and Alexander Bain, the latter having forged the crucial links among belief, conduct, and disposition by saying that a belief is that on which a person is prepared to act.

Like any philosophical movement, the nature and content of pragmatism is subject to considerable debate, whether it is one of exegesis (determining what the original pragmatists thought it was) or substantive philosophical theory (what is the most defensible theory that satisfies certain goals). The term pragmatism was first used in print by James, who credited the coining of the term to Peirce during the early 1870s. Prompted by James' use of the term and his crediting of the idea to him, Peirce began writing and lecturing on pragmatism to try and correct James' incorrect interpretation of what he had meant by the term. Peirce eventually coined the new name pragmaticism to mark what he regarded as the original idea.

Later American philosophy was for a while influenced by the British school of logical positivism, but that is not giving way to more diversity in American philosophical trends.

2006-12-01 03:06:26 · answer #2 · answered by Karma Chimera 4 · 0 1

Also the american knows a special kind of philosophy, the analitical philosophy. I think that fact confirm himself. Here in Europe we have an other history, and an other philosophy. So clear.

2006-12-01 04:30:37 · answer #3 · answered by diogene_cinico 3 · 0 0

it nevertheless hasn't replaced it nevertheless is take position destiny . take position destiny is the conception that united statesa. became destined to boost from the Atlantic seaboard to the Pacific Ocean. each and every from time to time take position destiny became interpreted so quite as to contain the eventual absorption of all North united statesa.: Canada, Mexico, Cuba and time-honored united statesa.. It has also been used to recommend and justify different territorial acquisitions. Advocates of take position destiny believed that enlargement became no longer purely reliable, yet that it became glaring ("take position") and certain ("destiny"). initially a political seize word of the 19th century, "take position destiny" finally grew to develop right into a wide-spread historic time period, commonly used as a synonym for the enlargement of united statesa. throughout the time of the North American continent. although, the time period is often utilized by political commentators and by critics of U.S. overseas coverage to signify interventions contained in the midsection East and elsewhere. in this utilization, take position destiny is interpreted because the underlying reason behind what's perceived by a few as "American imperialism".

2016-11-30 00:28:45 · answer #4 · answered by minogue 4 · 0 0

If these illiterates walked into a classroom with these questions they'd get laughed right out.

2006-12-01 04:26:55 · answer #5 · answered by -.- 4 · 0 0

Yep, that's about right.

2006-12-02 06:03:17 · answer #6 · answered by Voodoid 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers