suspended me for asking a few questions that weren't to their liking, has this happened to anyone else? Do we have to resort to asking questions about how dogs can predict when a thunderstorm is coming just to make sure we don't get suspended?
2006-12-01 02:36:02 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Psychology
You do not HAVE to ask dumb questions all they ask is that you use some common courtesy and Don't post insulting things or raunchy sexually provocative junk.
you are probably one of the what should I do retards fans but most human beings would like a bit more courtesy.
A mere 4% best answers is telling and nothing to brag about.
read the TOS... yea I know you think I am a "Mary Whitehouse"
thats what another potty mouth fool called me the other day.
2006-12-01 15:44:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I advise that the better reduce for contributions be performed away with, and that the utmost payouts in retirement nonetheless proceed to be as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social safe practices isn't a "supply away" application yet one which all of us make contributions to love a coupon prices plan, and must be shielded from different makes use of with the aid of the authorities. Do you settle or disagree and why? if you're so apprehensive about it then why no longer; first positioned it decrease back into the own sector and make to were no can take out funds from it for his or her own interest, second pay decrease back each penny you've borrowed from both Social safe practices and Medicare, third take the unlawful immigrants off of it and those who come over the following yet under no circumstances paid a penny to it, and finally have it the same for each body; in different words authorities officials are to participate in it and in the experience that they opt for something extra they do it on their own without the tax payers funding it?yet, the business stytem feeding the imbalances had under no circumstances been quite replaced. They, a collection of scholars, stated that each body prices of interest might want to be 3% or a lot less for each body to change into prosperous if wanted (that must be genuine also to taces). the suited economic difficulty might want to be, they stated, at the same time as there have been no prices of interest. Why no longer attempt this answer? the prosperous might want to nonetheless be prosperous. My question is: at the same time as soial safe practices will change right into a topic correct to federal debts, why no longer paintings with a balanced or income budget and spend no more desirable than is presented in, as any relatives has to attempt for? Why no longer ban all loobying presents with a view to get guidelines that serve the rustic? God bless u . s . a ..
2016-11-28 03:43:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are getting worse for sure. Even really basic questions get violations these days. I think they are trying to make this place a purely academic thing where I could ask "How old was Sokrates when he died?" but could not ask "What is the best episode of Doctor Who?"
Anything to do with real life is at risk of being a violation. I am sure I will get a suspension soon - I get violations most weeks these days. I got one the other day because I asked "Is Leeds or York better for shopping?". It is certainly getting worse.
Basically anything personal, chatty or emotional is not allowed, nor is anything controversial or political, nor anything fun. This place is getting to be a real drag.
2006-12-01 02:53:02 · answer #3 · answered by monkeymanelvis 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree with a-mazed what/who were you, and just exactly what kind of questions were you asking/or answering they must have been abusive or offensive and no we don't have to resort to asking about dogs predicting thunderstorms.
2006-12-01 02:51:36 · answer #4 · answered by braveheart321 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well you're back on now so banning you didn't work, did it>? Can't understand why they can't just delete unsuitable questions although i have come across several foulmouthed and racist cretins who I agree should be banned. Don't know what your questions were or what violation you created but if I were you I'd ask them and also ask for the points back.
2006-12-01 04:35:43 · answer #5 · answered by quatt47 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Without looking at your profile page, and the content of your activity? I wonder how you 'earned' that point total, with only that many questions, and such a low percent of best answers??? Do the math . . . sounds like you are a possible 'bogus' account maker, points feeder account? and you've been 'found out' and busted? Your moniker could be the first clue to who/what you really are . . .
Oh - I missed that one about the dog being a weather forecaster.
2006-12-01 02:42:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
I'm only a lowly leval 2 at the moment but i feel greatly for the case you propose.
I think there should be a voters 'tribunual' for the loss of your points.
2006-12-01 02:47:25 · answer #7 · answered by Eggman 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
well if you asked a good question like why do my green penguins like blue train smoke. then i cant see anything wrong. However if you had a bad question like when should blair step down well i say no more you deserved to be booted off.
2006-12-01 02:48:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
What were the questions? It must have been something bad. I feel for you mate. Why don't you call them and complain 08703522000? I would. I'm sure you could get a bit of support from a few of us on here.
2006-12-01 02:39:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
stupid i agree, i was under the impression some time ago that yahoo were going to sort this out...lets all ask nice questions about flowery things that cant possibly upset any one.
2006-12-01 02:40:28 · answer #10 · answered by grumpcookie 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋