Mary Shelley's Frankenstein VS Universal's version?

Question

which did you enjoy more?

Answer 1

This is really quite an excellent question. I'm not trying to evade the answer, but It's like comparing apples and oranges. Both are outstanding for what they did; but each attempted to do something entirely different.

Mary Shelley created a work which investigates the psychology of creation, and the consequences of mankind (as it were) aspiring to the knowldge of the gods. Her "monster" isn't really a monster at all. He's actually the most "human" being in the book.
Her work was cerebral and thought provoking.

Universal, on the other hand, was attempting to create a new genre of Horror Films to excite and frighten audiences. The studio wasn't aiming for "cerebral" but "visceral." They put together a first rate cast and crew, and managed to create a moody, and beautifully textured piece of melodramtic cinema. In my opinion it is the finest of it's kind.

Karloff, in particular tries to re-create the sense of humanity, and at times, actually reaches a point of lyricism in his performance, which, under all of that make-up, is no mean feat.

Each aimed at something differrent; and each hit its mark beautifully.

Wonderful question. Hope this answer helps.

Answer 2

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

Answer 3

The Universal version is classic film-making. Seen in the context of its time, it was terrifying for audiences, and explored questions that were taboo in western society of the early 1930s. And the acting was superb --- if you want to know more about the film's context, see Gods and Monsters, the brilliant art film with Sir Ian McKellen as an elderly director James Whale reflecting back on the film.

Answer 4

Mary Shelly's most definately.

Answer 5

Barney.