I can think of good things about both. I just can't choose which is more important to us.
2006-12-01 00:59:14 · 12 answers · asked by HELLBENT 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Both about equal.
Having abortions while drawing welfare is great.
And having an abortion helps pass the time while waiting for the welfare check to come in.
2006-12-01 01:18:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 5⤋
Boy, you're in the mood to stir up the hornets nest this morning. Both are necessary. Although, I personally could never have an abortion. That makes welfare nice. Helps pick up the slack of all the DEAD-BEAT Dads.
2006-12-01 09:06:43 · answer #2 · answered by T S 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Neocon hypocrisy just never stops and the judgmental tone of lying fundamentalist Christians is laughable.
You rag on a woman’s right to choice, but what about Republican – get-an-abortion-or-else policies? The island of Saipan, where companies,
“... employ children …most of them young girls, [who] have already escaped from countries such as China and Indonesia and are indebted to their employers. Thus, they work, sometimes 24 hour shifts, in the poorest of conditions for the lowest of wages. No sanitation, no health care, no breaks and very little food.”
If these young girls get pregnant, they are given the choice of:
a.) have an abortion or
b.) lose their jobs.
If the lose their jobs, they are forced into the sex industry.
What kind of people could do this? You tell me – since these are American – Christian – Republican supported companies.
Saipan is a US Protectorate where our clothing with the ‘Made in the USA’ labels comes from. It is a favorite vacation spot of Lobbyists and Congressional Republicans.
Clinton tried to expand child labor laws to protect these girls from being FORCED TO HAVE ABORTIONS, but the Republican Congress, LED BY TOM DELAY, blocked it. DeLay wanted to expand the system, literally ‘bring it home’, if you will, and institute the same system here on US soil, using Mexican immigrants as labor.
That is why Republicans have been trying so hard over the last several years to gut child-labor protection laws here in the US. So they can bring their little ‘young-girls slave industry’ legally inside America’s borders.
2006-12-01 09:17:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
When we are talking about Welfare are we talking about the 6 billion a year we give to the oil companies?
Or like the tax rebates like the one Paris Hilton got last year For about 180 grand
BTW - WELFARE REFORM
Was first enacted by liberals 1st in NJ by Jim Florio then modified and adopted nationwide by Bill Clinton
look it up
2006-12-01 10:22:34 · answer #4 · answered by gdeach 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I love welfare myself, im 50 years old and havent worked in 30 years.My BF is a back ground dancer for Richard Simmons, well used to be anyway so we do just fine.America is so stoopid LMAO!! They pay gay clowns like me to sit home and be gay LMAO!! :)
:)
http://www.sfgate.com/g/pictures/1999/06/27/gaypride4.jpg
2006-12-01 10:10:12 · answer #5 · answered by Feelgood 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Abortion.You compromise on welfare.
2006-12-01 09:05:36 · answer #6 · answered by Tommy G. 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The ability to speek freely without government interference, so that you can ask these questions without worrying about a knock at your door at 3 a.m.
Without that, there is no question.
2006-12-01 09:17:07 · answer #7 · answered by justa 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
is it true being on welfare will lead to more abortions. I think liberals can have their cake and eat it too.
2006-12-01 09:17:30 · answer #8 · answered by party_pam 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Under the lib plan you can have both.
2006-12-01 09:03:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Free money.....population control....Hard to choose between two great qualities......
2006-12-01 09:24:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋