English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have experienced many things in life in the rim of spirituality! And I myself had questioned this here event, because just as doctors have said, how is this poissible. Like so many have said, and myself, how the baby was feed. But seeing the proveth and the medical records inwhich the doctors couldn't explain, and put a mark where her navel should've been, there was only one explanation that I arrived at, that she is special, and a singn from the Heavenly Father! "GOD JEHOVAH!" A miracle child! With the Heavenly Father! "GOD JEHOVAH!" ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE! Those who critize and dispute this fact are ignorant and childish. Yes! I am a true godly man, and this is the very reason that I receives negartive feedback, from those who are narrow minded with a one track mind, due to their lacking in the Holy Word of the Heavenly Father! Especially these here false pastors! I can say this that "GOD JEHOVAH!" AND THE DOCTORS KNOWS THE TRUTH! To all have a nice and blessed day!

2006-11-30 23:20:52 · 10 answers · asked by minister 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

10 answers

This so-called "question" has no connection with the bible or with Jehovah's Witnesses.

Learn more:
http://watchtower.org/e/jt/

2006-12-01 02:38:44 · answer #1 · answered by achtung_heiss 7 · 2 0

It's not possible for a child to live in the womb without a umbilical cord. True, God can do all things, but there is no reason why God would do this.

The only babies I'm aware of that lack a navel are those born with severe umbilical hernias requireing surgery; some lose their navels during the reconstructive portion of the surgery.

Peace.

2006-12-01 07:28:36 · answer #2 · answered by Suzanne: YPA 7 · 1 0

If all this were true then we would have heard about this "miracle" on the news. The part about 9/11 is extremely distasteful and shame on you for using a tragedy like that. If you knew about it you should have tried to stop it. No "man of God" would try to gain anything, including notoriety off the deaths and pain of so many.

2006-12-01 07:33:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ok odd and ty for wisking everyone a nice day but i must quote House atm (very awesome show) "just because we cant explain it doesn't mean there isn't and explanaition it means we dont understand it yet" (could still be heavenely intervention) i am sorry i remain cynical. I leave my judgement of all religion until after i die. You have a nice day too :)

2006-12-01 07:25:26 · answer #4 · answered by mcr_fan_4evr 2 · 0 0

Well I suppose a child could be born without an umbilical cord.... if they were hatched from an egg. All fetus need the cord to feed not to mention to get rid of waste.

2006-12-01 07:29:17 · answer #5 · answered by Stephen 6 · 0 0

Sheesh...if my faith hinged on the Dogma of the Belly Button, I'd become an atheist. I know miracles occur, but for this one, I wear the "ignorant and childish" hat.

2006-12-01 07:52:49 · answer #6 · answered by 4999_Basque 6 · 0 0

maybe its an alien? or the Devil he that is called Satan is tempting us to believe false? for are we not taught, that, to be human is to be of His image the image of God. to have one head, two arms two legs etc does that not include one navel?
Amen

2006-12-01 07:27:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Sheeeesh, looks like you forgot to take your medication again, this morning.

2006-12-01 07:23:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Check the mother again. If she's still a virgin, then Jesus is BACK!

2006-12-01 07:25:00 · answer #9 · answered by Bhagwad 3 · 0 0

Boy are you dense.---- It was a butt baby

2006-12-01 07:25:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers