The atheist agenda was trading Bibles for porn at UTSA (UT at San Antonio)....Isn't that a negative way to push your point of view... What do you think?
By the way.. It was magazines like Playboy and Penthouse...
2006-11-30 17:27:28 · 17 answers · asked by Myra G 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Indigo chill out... and yes the Atheist Agenda sponsored it... I'm not saying all Atheist thinks it is right... I asked if it was a wrong way to share the position.
2006-11-30 17:52:38 · update #1
Bible $16.95
playboy $6.99
Penthouse $7.95
this is hardly a fair trade.
i agree that this is a very poor way to try to push an intellegent agenda. it just goes to show you there are fanatics in every system of belief.
2006-11-30 17:35:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Trading bibles to people for there porn thats the first ive heard of that but i mean if it worked. I dont call the bible smut though.
2006-11-30 17:31:42 · answer #2 · answered by out dated prod! 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
HAHAHAHAHA! Don't be upset rather use your better judgment of whether they are pushing for something letigimate or they are just crazy!
Better yet get the magazines, tell them you don't have bibles to trade for it ,then burn them when you get home. You think they will last for a year buying these mags. Good for the publishers!But these idiots will not have the cash to last.
They are worst than suicide bombers-at least these people have agendas! And they believe they go to heaven with virgins! hahahahaha! No offense meant for Islams who believe in Peace.Salam
2006-11-30 17:40:20 · answer #3 · answered by wolfass 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Heh, that sounds hilarious, I like that.
And it's just as negative as bibles for smut, a program that was held at my university once, doing exactly the opposite (giving out bibles for people who turned in porn).
2006-11-30 17:37:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Interestingly, if people do that, no one really hears about it, but if people did that with the Koran it would be a national travesty and there would be riots in the middle east and more nuns getting shot in the back. Fun, huh.
2006-11-30 17:30:44 · answer #5 · answered by RYAN P C 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The atheist agenda? Please, it was probably one group of people, or less, who decided to do that. So I guess all of us elsewhere who never even heard about that are at fault to. Interesting.
At least "our" "agendas" aren't trying to make it law.
Edit: Of course, you have to wonder about your own people then if they'd actually trade up for that. Your agenda for your own people is failing.
2006-11-30 17:47:22 · answer #6 · answered by Indigo 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Wow...Was that the best that they could come up with to prove to everyone how ridiculous supposedly educated people can act? What a bunch of jackasses.
2006-11-30 17:29:49 · answer #7 · answered by The Nag 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
As long as they weren't forcing people to accept the magazines, no.
2006-11-30 17:30:48 · answer #8 · answered by Bhagwad 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I haven't heard anything about that, but now that it's been suggested I would like to give it a try. "Trade in your bible for nudie magazines," I'd like to see how that goes over.
I will ring your doorbell and run away!!!
2006-11-30 18:43:29 · answer #9 · answered by Satan Lord of Flames 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
... so... they were trading bibles for naked girl pictures. I think it's offensive to the girls who might want to trade in but aren't interested in girls. Otherwise it's their business.
2006-11-30 17:31:45 · answer #10 · answered by spirenteh 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋