How can you compare TNA to WWE in any sence at all? TNA is about WRESTLING, I cannot stress this enough. In the past five years all WWE has cared about is being a gigantic corporation that doesn't care for it's fans at all. They have all these "sports entertainers" these days that are very large muscular men, but don't know a suplex from an armdrag (that's an exaggeration so please, no uninteligent/no thought involved comments on that).
TNA has literally the best WRESTLERS out there today.
WRESTLERS don't go out to the ring and do 3 moves over and over again. But apparently "sport-entertainers" do. I believe that I'll stick to watching WRESTLING, and not WWE's product (By the way, everyone alive in the past 60 years has known that wrestling or WWE's product "sports-entertainment" is scripted, so please don't start the "AY DONT U NO WRESLINS FAKE" stuff).
If you watch WWE sports-entertainment thats fine, but don't compare it to TNA wrestling.
TNA! TNA! TNA! TNA! TNA! TNA! TNA! TNA!
2006-11-30 16:41:02 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Very good point bludyone. All wrestling is entertainment but the direction that WWE is taking with it is to an extreme. There's entertainment, then there is trying to hard.
2006-11-30 16:53:55 · update #1
Oh yeah, I forgot to add that your answer shouldn't be idiotic. I guess I should've put this before "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXY's" decided to answer. Sorry pal!!!
2006-11-30 17:03:29 · update #2
"TNE?
you dont compare WWE to TNE
TNE would always be second to WWE
basically they aint in the same level"
THEY'RE NOT THE SAME LEVEL, BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT THE SAME THING!!!!!
Be sure you can comprehend large amounts of words at one time also...
2006-11-30 17:07:57 · update #3
Great answers guys...seriously...
2006-12-01 14:37:41 · update #4
You cannot compate TNA to WWE. TNA does a better job of hyping their pay per views with 1 show a week than WWE does with their 50,000 shows. Look at last nights WWE pay per view. They only announced 2 matches before the show and I haven't heard one person tell me that they thought it was a good pay per view. The WWE for some strange reason doesn't even think that their world title program should be given the strongest push. Right now the top program is DX against RKO. Then there is the program with the "classic superstars". Then somewhere way down there is the program between John Cena and Umaga for the world title. And who in the world thinks Vince is going to put the world title around Umaga's waist? Can anyone remember the last time a charicter like Umaga held the WWE world title? If you can't cut an interview you don't become the world champion. That simple.
TNA hasn't done the best job promoting every match on their pay per view but they only have 1 show a week. A 1 hour show at that, And still people are far more excited about Kurt Angle v. Samoa Joe or LAX v. AMW or A.J. Styles v. Christopher Daniels (just wait) than they are about any WWE match.
This is not about how much entertainment their is or wrestling. This is about how much effort the companies put into their shows. This is about how much the fans care about their programs. If you don't beleive me, just ask yourself "do I really cae about John Cena. v Umaga?" And i'm not just attacking John Cena. Cena can be a fantastic champion. I see the potential for him to have exciting fueds over the world title. But the booking is terrible.
2006-12-04 12:36:18 · answer #1 · answered by jewishneocon 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE international call there have been many mythical stars to carry that belt over the years which include Bruno Sammartino, Ric flair, The Rock and Stone chilly Steve Austin purely to a acceptance some. WHC call at the same time as this belt change into favourite in 2002 that is linage will be traced each and every of the some time previous to to George Hackenschmidt and 1904. TNA international call it has reputable international call prestige through PWI mag and that is the numerous championship of an truly agency while the ECW call now is purely the numerous championship of a lackluster WWE kind. TNA Tag team call in my opinion TNA has the finest tag team branch in all of professional wrestling immediately with accurate communities like Beer funds and team 3-d. WWE's tag champs now are 2 singles stars that they did no longer have something for thus that they purely with the help of them jointly. WWE Intercontinental call decrease back in the day the WWE Champion would were the numerous draw for the agency despite the indisputable fact that the Intercontinental Champion change into the finest wrestler in the employer on the time that he held the belt same to on the names which have that belt over the years Bret Hart, Mr appropriate and Ricky Steamboat purely to call some. WWE women individuals's call this kind of large style of mythical women individuals have that belt which include the awesome Moolah, Aludra Blayze, and Bull Nakano. TNA Knockouts call a large style of very proficient women individuals's competition have held the belt which include Gail Kim, Tara, incredible Kong and Angelina Love.
2016-10-08 01:11:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are advantages to watching both TNA and WWE. Both companies give you different things. Yes WWE has great wrestlers and is very entertaining to watch, but they tend to recycle storylines or make rediculous ones.
TNA puts some great spins on wrestling like the X-Division match. But if you watch closely, most of the moves performed are all Flash. Watch Ron the Truth Killings, or some of their finisher moves. Just too flashy. But TNA has great athletes like Samoa Joe and AJ Styles and former WWE superstars like Christian and Kurt Angle.
Both shows are good to watch.
2006-12-01 09:12:22 · answer #3 · answered by ManU115 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why even bother to compare. First of all-Sports entertainment wether it be ECW, WWE, Japan, TNA, even indie circuits, ALL of them are scripted for the purpose of-come on say it with me ENTERTAINMENT.
TNA is becoming a force to reckon with in the wrestling entertainment industry but its no WWE. For starters the production value isn't anywhere near what it needs to be to go against WWE and the acting is as bad as the first month of ECW acting when it started being broadcast on SciFi (and you who watched the first month of ECW know what Im talking about-yea those missed cues, and scripted monologues that made CM punk look like some douche when he was first being introduced-) OF COURSE ECW has picked up the slack and finally it seems the acting lessons are paying off! (Of course I hate to say this but Matt Striker is actually very good at what he does)
Anyhow TNA is at par while WWE sits on eagle and let me tell you I enjoy watching both and can't stand to choose sides but if I had to well I would go with WWE because despite my favorites at TNA-AJ Styles, Kurt Angle, Samoa Joe, Sting, Christian-they still don't add up to my favs at WWE-DX, John Cena, Rated RKO, Bobby Lashley, Rey Mysterio, Chris Benoit-
Also, when it comes down to watching wrestling and how you will "stick to watching WRESTLING"-well Im sure ur local high school has a wrestling team and that's where you will find true wrestling. Those are wrestlers.
What we watch on TV are great chorographed entertainers and you need to make sure you understand that. Yes, at least half have that mat wrestling training, but what sports entertainment is really about is making sure u know how to land, take a blow, and charisma.
"The Cure"
KeMo
2006-11-30 18:05:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
personally i think that in ten years time the TNA will be putting the wwe out of business.
all the w(orst) w(restling) e(ver) do is recycle the same old storylines and have the same soap opera action, the TNA is about action, TNA shows dont consist of three hours of soap opera and then maybe 10 minutes of fighting because they know that lack of soap opera is what wins them fans from the wwe.
now on to the talent; the TNA have some of the people that the wwe stupidly over looked or under used, Samoa Joe for instance - he could make an absolute killing in the wwe if he so wished.
i'll put it simply; the wwe is a soap opera and the TNA is an action show, i know which one i prefer
TNA TNA TNA TNA TNA TNA
2006-11-30 23:18:27 · answer #5 · answered by Austin Darkora 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
WWE is by far larger than TNA.TNA doesn't have the money to compete with the WWE.TNA is losing money because the fans get in for free and WWE is making truckloads of money.Even though Kurt Angle went to TNA,TNA's ratings were still below 1 and the WWE's ratings are normally above 4.0.TNA is still sports entertainment,so is the WWE and you can compare them.
2006-11-30 18:07:06 · answer #6 · answered by WWE Champ 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
TNA does have wrestlers. WWE does have wrestlers. Its just WWe's corporate lackeys telling people who is the biggest seller (thanks hulk) and who brings in ratings.
If you want to get down to it.. look at Bret Harts videos, he did the same routine of 9 moves. What was he? an entertainer or a wrestler?
It is all sports entertainment, no matter what company it is. They will have the showmen and the sportsmen. Its just that lately WWe has gone more showmen here recently, which is sad.
2006-11-30 16:47:46 · answer #7 · answered by bludyone 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
TNA is nipping at the WWE's heel and I for one couldn't be happier. Hopefully this will bring about some good competition al al the old Monday night Wars. I really miss old school WCW...and old WWF. In a competition between these two only the fans can win. Also TNA has better wrestlers and word is they are tryinng to get Jerhico. Go TNA
2006-11-30 16:44:31 · answer #8 · answered by rolandofgileadiscool 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
WWE is a larger cooperation than TNA and they have more fans.Obviously they do care about their fans because they have more.WWE will always be the best.Almost the whole roster of TNA used to be in WWE.It's just a place for extra WWE wrestlers to go.I don't think TNA wants to mess with WWE because they could be the next WCW.
2006-11-30 18:26:49 · answer #9 · answered by The wwe diva of 2010 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I agree with you wwe has become stale and rough around the edges its just because vince dont consider tna as a competition threat theres got to be atleast a wrestling association that can and wants to take wwe out of business because 1. its gotten so horrible,so gay,so damn stupid lately i as a wwe fan decided to stop watching and 2 and its gotten so predictable and boring.
2006-11-30 17:24:54 · answer #10 · answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋