Whats worse for a plant, no water or no sunlight? I need to answer this for sciecne project so ya help me out people. I know that lack of both kill them, but i wanna know what kills it faster, or o is it just staight up worse
2006-11-30 13:29:47 · 11 answers · asked by Karlen U 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Botany
It would post probably be sunlight.......some plant organisms may survive without water for long periods of time, such as ones in the desert....... but sunlight is required for green plants to make food which unlike for humans......... food is the bigger priority than water
2006-11-30 13:34:13 · answer #1 · answered by Tina 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No water...
If there were sunlight but no water, the plant will not be able to make food as water is essential...
If no sunlight, if the water is fertile enuff, the plant can still survives...
2006-11-30 13:41:48 · answer #2 · answered by kelvin low 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Water vapor is definitely a greenhouse gas, and extra water vapor contained in the ambience motives the ambience preserve extra warmth. yet what's causing water vapor to strengthen contained in the ambience? Water vapor will strengthen through warm temperature. Warming motives extra evaporation, extra water contained in the ambience. that is a comments to even if that motives the initial warming. at the same time as water vapor is a more advantageous greenhouse gas than CO2 it purely continues to be contained in the ambience for some days while CO2 continues to be contained in the ambience for hundreds of years. If the atmsophere were to sit back slightly, the quantity of water vapor will shrink in very few days and strengthen the cooling. in all danger, warming from CO2 motives extra water vapor which amplifies the warming. The water vapor comments strengthen the outcome of CO2 with the aid of a minimum of 2x and as a lot as 4x at the same time as the interplay with different feedbacks is seen. If international warming is a hoax, you need to be very very alarmed because it signifies that each body of the most excellent scientists contained in the international are in a huge conspiracy adversarial to each of the persons of the international. It ability there is not any technological information that we are able to have self belief because all of academia and each of the publishers of technological information journals are in on the conspiracy. It signifies that each body technological progression is crashing to a stop because the entire medical approach is a faux. The link below is to a paper that discusses the elements feedbacks to CO2 from the mag of the american Meteorological Society.
2016-11-28 02:48:20 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lack of water definately. Although it does need sunlight, some plants are able to struggle without. But they all need water indefinately.
2006-11-30 13:32:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sun....plants manufacture there food through photosynthesis.....no sun no food, but this can be a problem because the more sun exposure the more water they need (unless its a succulent)....so that's a toss up
2006-11-30 13:33:12 · answer #5 · answered by Diamond in the Rough 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'd say no water is worse because that's how te plant gets it's nutrients and all.
without light, the plant still grows but it lacks chlorophyll.
2006-11-30 13:32:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no water causes it 2 wilt, the sunlight, it wont get any food, so probably no sunlight.
2006-11-30 13:33:26 · answer #7 · answered by mrbaseball2012 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd say light. Plants need it for photosynthesis.
Probably die faster without light than it would without water.
SHOOP DA WOOP!
2006-11-30 13:31:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yea probably no water cuz think of it this way we can live longer in the dark than w/o water etc so so can they
2006-11-30 13:37:41 · answer #9 · answered by Grapes 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no water is worse
probably a week without sun wouldn't kil it
2006-11-30 13:32:06 · answer #10 · answered by kurticus1024 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋