Many, why shouldn't there be? How is science or biology in any way incompatible with god?
Einstein
Gregor Mendel
Now you answer my question, how is science and/or biology incompatible with a belief in God?
2006-11-30 08:35:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nick F 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Einstein believed in a pantheistic god. He spoke of "Spinoza's God." His best friend, Godel, was a theist. Godel is one of the most famous mathematician / logicians of the 20th century. Stephen Hawking is thought to be deist. Francis Collins, head of the genome project, is Evangelical Christian. Newton and Pasteur were Christian. John Polkinghorne, theoretical physicist at Cambridge, is an Anglican priest. Alister McGrath could count as a scientist even though he is a practicing theologian. He has a Ph.D in biophysics from Oxford.
And the following is a list of earlier scientists who were Christian.
Roger Bacon
Johannes Kepler
Johannes Baptista van Helmont
Blaise Pascal
Robert Boyle
Anton van Leeuwenhoek
Carolus Linnaeus
Leonhard Euler
John Dalton
Michael Faraday
John Frederick William Herschel
Matthew Fontaine Maury
James Prescott Joule
Gregor Mendel
William Thomson, Lord Kelvin
James Clerk Maxwell
George Washington Carver
Arthur Stanley Eddington
2006-11-30 08:37:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are some today ,(i don`t know if they are famous ) that are putting a religious spin on science to promote Creationism.They do this by performing experiments ,similar to ice dating ,but using high contrast temperature conditions to invalidate the Ice ring dating system.
Their experiment are done in extreme temperature changes done in a short amount of time .These are not accurate because they don`t require sublimination of frozen water ,but uses the fast temperature changes to produce the rings .
2006-11-30 08:42:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Charles Darwin
2006-11-30 10:06:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Therapist King 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Isacc Newton, records indicate that Newton studied alchemy and other hermtic/occult sciences which rely on the existence of a higher power then humanity , this would indicate he accept that there was a God or something of that nature
2006-11-30 08:44:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by harro_06 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know whether you'd consider him famous but Professor Robert Winston the biologist and fertility expert who spend so much time on our TVs is a practicing Jew.
2006-11-30 09:00:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by annebythegate 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Einstein
2006-11-30 08:47:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by jefferyspringer57@sbcglobal.net 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It used to be a capital crime in many European countries to deny the Holy Trinity. Regardless of what they might have believed they all paid lip service to God.
But, fair being fair, before recent developments in biology, physics and cosmology, there were so many unanswerable questions that "there must be a God" was acceptable even in scientific circles.
I don't hold it against them. They once believed in the Philosopher's Stone too.
2006-11-30 08:36:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by XYZ 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
In more recent times, there are Stephen Barr and Stanley Jaki, both physicists and both Catholics. Barr has written an hilarious critique of celebrity atheist Richard Dawkins.
2006-11-30 09:04:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Blaargh_42 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If someone answers "Albert Einstein", I think I'll have to hurt someone.
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein#Religious_views )
Note: "Naturalistic Pantheist" is more of an admiration of nature than anything else.
---
Yes. Famous cell biologist Ken Miller is a Roman Catholic. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Miller )
Ken Miller is one of the scientists that testified for the evolutionary case over intelligent design at the Dover trial.
2006-11-30 08:37:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋