I agree that racial profiling is bad because people make unjust assumptions over someone based on the way they were born. But how is this different then police profiling men vs. women. How is it different from police targeting someone who is poor vs. someone who is rich. Yes you are born into a race but you are also born with many other characteristics that make you a more likely criminal. What I am trying to argue is that ignoring race, sex, apperance is impossible. It will always be a factor as long as men and blacks commit more crimes then whites and women.
What we need to do is let the police know the limits to profiling but let them come up with their own assumptions. Don't promote it but don't attack it. The ACLU is wrong in attacking just racial profiling, if they want to make their case stronger or more legitimate they should attack all forms of inherent profiling (like sex, appearance, hair colour...).
2006-11-30
06:53:47
·
5 answers
·
asked by
gordongecko
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law Enforcement & Police