English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-30 06:49:27 · 12 answers · asked by jim j 1 in Society & Culture Languages

12 answers

Soy is from the verb ser, and estoy is from the verb estar.

I use the following acronyms to help my students remember when to use ser and when to use estar.

Use Ser when talking about POOT
P = Personality/Physical Description
O = Origin
O = Occupation
T = Time

Use Estar when talking about CHL
C = Condition
H = Health
L - Location


Hope this helps!

2006-11-30 07:40:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Jim, they are all very wrong. This one idiot says I am from united states is permanent- not at all, you could move, and have citizenship in a different country. Or I am bored, and that will change- not if you ar a goldfish. Here is how it really works:

Soy means I am, and can refer to description, origin, nationality, occupation, time and date, or religion.

Estoy also means I am, and can refer to health, emotion, or location. End of discussion .

2006-11-30 07:02:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They can be seen as passive (ser) and active (estar) in a non-grammatical sense. Ser tells you what something is, the nature of its being, while estar refers more to what something does. I might use soy (the first-person present of ser) to tell you what I am, but I'd use estoy (the first-person present of estar) to tell you what I am being.

Now that's probably as clear as mud, but let me give you a few examples. I might say, "Estoy enfermo." That would tell you that I am being sick, that I am sick at the moment. But it doesn't tell you what I am. Now if I were to say, "Soy enfermo," that would have a different meaning entirely. That would refer to who I am, to the nature of my being. We might translate that as "I am a sick person" or "I am sickly."

Note similar differences in these examples:

Estoy cansado, I am tired. Soy cansado, I am a tired person.
Estoy feliz, I'm happy now. Soy feliz, I am happy by nature.
Está callada, she's being quiet. Es callada, she's introverted.
No soy listo, I'm not a quick thinker. Estoy listo, I'm ready.
One way of thinking about it is to think of ser as being roughly equivalent to "equals." Another way of thinking about it is that estar often refers to a temporary condition, while ser frequently refers to a permanent condition. But there are some exceptions.
Among the major exceptions to the above way of thinking is that ser is used in expressions of time, such as "Son las dos de la tarde" for "It's 2 p.m." Also, we use estar to indicate someone has died — quite a permanent condition: Está muerto, he is dead.

Along that line, estar is used to indicate location. Estoy en casa, I am at home. But, soy de México, I am from Mexico.

There are also a few idiomatic expressions that simply need to be learned, although that comes naturally with time: La manzana es verde, the apple is green. La manzana está verde, the apple is unripe. Está muy bien la comida, the meal tastes very good.

Note that sometimes estar is modified by an adverb such as bien rather than being followed by an adjective. Estoy bien, I'm fine.

2006-11-30 06:56:30 · answer #3 · answered by Doethineb 7 · 2 0

Generally, soy is used to say something which is permanent and estoy is used to say something which is liable to change, including location.

eg:
soy grande = I am tall
estoy en la tienda = I am in the shop

2006-11-30 06:59:06 · answer #4 · answered by hello772345 2 · 0 0

A prevalent rule that ought to help you to undergo in concepts at the same time as to apply ser and estar is that ser is often used for everlasting features, at the same time as estar is used for non everlasting or unpredicted circumstances, or area. hence, if you're a completely shy human being; it really is, being shy is area of your personality, you should claim, "Soy tímida." (everlasting) if you're usually no longer shy, yet are basically having a non everlasting feeling of shyness (because you're talking in the front of a vast crew, operating example), "Estoy tímida." (non everlasting or unpredicted) undergo in concepts that estar is continually for area. So "España está en Europa," notwithstanding Spain is continually interior a similar area. There are some extra intricacies of ser vs. estar for you to need to study later on. yet attempt to carry close what i have given you first. you are able to tweak your utilization later. the previous answerer makes an outstanding element that some belongings you employ with ser are literally not everlasting, like being a touch baby. yet when something is really unpredicted or unusual, use estar. operating example, "Las naranjas están verdes." ("The oranges are eco-friendly.") Oranges are not many times eco-friendly, so that is unpredicted.

2016-10-16 11:14:04 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Soy refers to something that in unchangeable about you: Soy Ana.

Estoy refers to somthing that can change (mood, etc): Estoy listo (I am ready.)

2006-11-30 06:53:06 · answer #6 · answered by eilishaa 6 · 0 0

soy is a permanent condition while estoy is temporary.

Soy de los Estados Unidos. That will never change.
Estoy aburrida. That will change.

2006-11-30 06:52:45 · answer #7 · answered by Angel Baby 5 · 0 0

Estoy is a conjugation of "to be".

Soy is an agricultural product and source of soy milk and tofu, rich in protein too.

2006-11-30 06:58:06 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 0 3

I bet it's quite difficult for forgeiners...
soy answers What are you?
estoy answers How/Where are you?

2006-11-30 07:36:09 · answer #9 · answered by Yerko 3 · 0 0

I was going to give the same answer as everybody else, but they beat me to it.

Altenatively, soy is a sauce served with Chinese meals
Estoy sounds like a kind of games console.

2006-11-30 06:59:02 · answer #10 · answered by Roy S 3 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers