2006-11-30 03:43:44 · 13 answers · asked by Not From The Lebanon 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Margaret Thatcher went to war with Argentina when she was prime minister of Britain , so no
2006-11-30 03:50:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I see no problem with letting women lead our countries. But if you think that would end all wars and create peace, you must have never met a woman.
2006-11-30 03:49:24 · answer #2 · answered by Chris J 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
man or woman, they'd still be human, and with humanity there never will be an end to wars and eternal peace. power corrupts, and neither man nor woman is immune to that as a gender.
wat u need to do is find enough good people who wanna be in politics but can be trusted to stay good.
i have nothing against women leaders. i've had women leaders. not much different from male leaders.
2006-11-30 03:52:51 · answer #3 · answered by implosion13 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am not sure if women are the answer to end all wars. What makes you think that??
2006-11-30 03:47:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ask Indira Gandhi, Golda Meir, or Margaret Thatcher, all of whom were Warrior Women.
2006-11-30 03:56:19 · answer #5 · answered by Yahoo Will Never Silence Me 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would start another World war on Fashion and cosmetics as we have war on oil!
2006-11-30 04:20:53 · answer #6 · answered by crak 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uh - except once a month when she goes ballistic and hits the red button in an emotional moment. :)
2006-11-30 04:34:12 · answer #7 · answered by BaseballGrrl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there might not be wars, but there certainly wouldn't be peace.
2006-11-30 03:46:49 · answer #8 · answered by jinenglish68 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Possible but not sure! Human mind is devious!
2006-11-30 03:46:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can you just see TWO OPPOSING WOMEN LEADERS.
Which one will flinch!
2006-11-30 04:33:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋