2006-11-30 01:11:00 · 24 answers · asked by alec c 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Etiquette
Say he does fancy a poo after a curry out with the lads on a Saturday nite and the whole being without an anus story is true then wouldn't he just creat one temporarily, use godly loo roll and then uncreate it again when he was done? That is what I would do if I were God. And why would anyone in his position miss out on having the best room in the house.
2006-11-30 02:09:32 · answer #1 · answered by MI5 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
This is a very important topic because anything that eats has to go to the bathroom and so it cannot be God. God does not eat food.
The Aboriginies call God "Attnatu" meaning the one without an anus.
There is also a subtle hint about this when the gospels talk about Jesus (pbuh) eating food.
2006-11-30 09:28:04 · answer #2 · answered by Nothing to say? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the Christian faith, God had to become a human (remember the Christmas story?). This would imply that "God in Human Flesh" (aka Jesus) did in fact use the bathroom for the time that Jesus walked the earth.
However, the Bible is strangely silent on this point......
2006-11-30 09:19:18 · answer #3 · answered by geek49203 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Mmm. This god thing is getting out of hand. Without a shred of evidence for his existence, people are actually speculating on whether he pees? Insane.
2006-11-30 09:47:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When he came to Earth as Jesus he did (well, in that time there were no bathrooms).
2006-11-30 09:20:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Hes spiritual
2006-11-30 09:12:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is not necessary for spirits to have bodily functions of any type. They do not have bodies to begin with.
2006-11-30 09:47:42 · answer #7 · answered by hopflower 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously . What do you think the human race is?
2006-11-30 12:37:09 · answer #8 · answered by redjonjak 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We were made at his resemblance, so if we need to go to the loo, I would say He/She does too.
2006-11-30 09:22:15 · answer #9 · answered by . 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
since there is no proof [any] god exists, the question has to be irrelevant, so why did you ask it ? and why did I bother to answer it ?
2006-11-30 09:26:49 · answer #10 · answered by Billy 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋