English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I understand the definition of brinkmanship is 'art or practice of going to the very edge of a dangerous situation (eg war) before moving back or withdrawing' but I can't quite imagine what good that brings as opposed to, say, attacking without withdrawing or withdrawing without going to the edge. Can anybody clarify this for me?

2006-11-29 16:47:40 · 1 answers · asked by july 2 in Politics & Government Military

1 answers

In the end, someone HAS to back down in order to avert full scale conflict. The one that flinches is the one that faces severe political losses on the home front.

2006-11-29 16:56:00 · answer #1 · answered by Walter 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers