And why would he change his mind? Is it because of that false genetic decay after the first perfect creations? Hypothetically, if I found my sister and I had perfect genes, would it be okay for us to incest?
2006-11-29 14:26:47 · 8 answers · asked by Alucard 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Hey, you gotta do what you gotta do. And sometimes that means banging your hot sister.
2006-11-29 14:29:25 · answer #1 · answered by Contract Killer 1 · 0⤊ 6⤋
No, because a the concept of a "relative" morality indicates at least two sentient, equal beings, with different viewpoints. God is One, and there is nobody else remotely like Him. His viewpoint is unique, being all inclusive and superior in both expanse and wisdom. How can another being claim to have an even remotely similiar viewpoint to life as God does, to claim a "relatively different view of morality"? Obviously, none can. God sets the standard. Only those who wish for NO STANDARDS try to claim "relative morality".
How do you know the claim of genetic decay is false?
Oddly enough, since many cultures practiced inter-family marriages (including ancient Hebrews), wouldn't it seem MORE convienent to leave them as "not sinful"? If the men who wrote the Bible were really just some simple-minded bronze-age goons, making up religion as they went along, wouldn't it make sense to "leave alone" something they already practiced with a vengence?
Under the Judeo-Christian religion, no, you cannot screw your sister and be "ok", no matter what your genes look like. Right and wrong is not up to you. You also have no idea what perfection is, since imperfection abounds, therefore are incapable of decideing whose genes are "perfect", and whose are not.
2006-11-29 14:46:33 · answer #2 · answered by MamaBear 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
at the starting up we are no longer residing in he previous days. circumstances have replaced. 2d those issues that were once licensed are literally not via actual incontrovertible actuality that we are now residing contained in the hot testomony. If yo study the bible it talks about this stuff. No i'm declaring that God made the substitute. he allowed issues to be a touch extra uncomplicated. that's no longer about replacing what's moral, it really is about God doing what HE needs no remember what. because you study the bible would you truly stay contained in the former testomony or the hot. The previous testomony became a time that persons will be stoned to demise for no longer believing. contained in the hot testomony God opened the door and allowed issues to modify. God is the purely human being who can enable something and what He says is going element sparkling.
2016-11-29 23:09:47 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hope somewhere in the Old Testament, that official word was given that incest is unnecessary and wrong. It is a landmark that is never spoken about strongly enough. Like God's promise not to flood the earth again.
2006-11-29 14:41:07 · answer #4 · answered by TarKettle 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Where do you get incest from nowhere is it written about that except after the Law was given
2006-11-29 14:33:14 · answer #5 · answered by Terry S 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
When did God say incest was okay?
2006-11-29 14:33:28 · answer #6 · answered by arewethereyet 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I suppose they've never read Genesis, eh??
2006-11-29 14:36:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
thats from the bible written by men. morality is morality
2006-11-29 14:29:36 · answer #8 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋