2006-11-29 12:28:52 · 10 answers · asked by Socratic Pig 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Not in the least. That was the misconception of the Scribes and Pharisees as well. They did not recognize Him for who He was...the Anointed One...the Messiah. They were blind to the Truth.
In Jesus own words:
"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill."
2006-11-29 12:37:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Against WHOSE convention? Jesus went against man's traditions set up to negate or undermine God's truth. He was a heretic and blasphemer in so far as man's wrong ideas are concerned. But Jesus was in every way righteous and true in all He said and did.
2006-11-29 12:34:13 · answer #2 · answered by Seraph 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
maximum in all probability, they by no ability even idea that about Jesus. Jesus' teachings share lots in worry-free with Pharisaic teachings. Even Jesus' practise about healing on the Sabbath became shared by the writers of the Talmud, who surely descended from the Pharisees. The Gospels depict the Pharisees in a foul mild, yet this isn't inevitably traditionally precise. there have been ulterior causes for depicting them that way. So maximum in all probability, Pharisees does no longer have cared a wit what Jesus became declaring, and in the adventure that they did, they probable would have agreed with a reliable little bit of it.
2016-11-29 22:55:57 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He probably was as he contravened the accepted religious and social morays of the day. That is not to say he was wrong, but it shows us that the standards and doctrines of any era are defined by the authority figures of that era. It is only with distance and hindsight that the truth or integrity of any philosophy becomes clear.
2006-11-29 12:43:30 · answer #4 · answered by miketwemlow 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Jesus was/is God. How can He blaspheme Himself?
2006-11-29 12:36:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I suppose he was, if you took the establishment's perspective. But then if you took the establishment's perspective all the time, then George Washington would be remembered as a terrorist.
2006-11-29 12:37:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. I don't believe Jesus was either one. He stood up for what he believed in, being even willing to die for what he believed in.
He was a bit of a revolutionary.
2006-11-29 12:33:33 · answer #7 · answered by smoothsoullady 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, I wouldn't call him a heretic.
2006-11-29 12:35:27 · answer #8 · answered by LearningGuy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope. That's one of my favorite things about him.
2006-11-29 12:34:11 · answer #9 · answered by milomax 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no.
2006-11-29 12:31:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋