English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

All these are opinions. Leave your comments here after you read, see if you have better insight into the US and Iraq war ^_^

When is the Iraqis become terrorists, US bombed their country, so the Iraqis bombed them back. Wealthy Americans bombed them in a pretty way with tanks, aircrafts, missiles, etc… Poor Iraqis bombed them in an uglier way, with suicide bomb, hidden landmine etc… Even though they are using different method but the result is the same ^_^

If you think US in Iraq is not because of oil then I am pretty sure that you are in the lowest quintile, I am not trying to insult you because you are the one that insulting me ^_^ If I am wrong then which mean that I am the one in the lowest quintile not you lol…

2006-11-29 12:02:44 · 7 answers · asked by Hermes 2 in Politics & Government Military

If US playing god to save Iraq, why the United Nation didn’t support them, and even their own Americans people didn’t support him that is why he lost the two houses ^_^ US didn’t even have coalition to support them in the war, don’t tell me their coalitions are England and Japan.

If the US steals oil from Iraq, do you think they are stupid enough to do it in an obvious way? For example use ships or airplanes to transport every pumped barrel of oil back to the Unite State so every one can see and envy the American people, No lol… they can just let the Iraqi people do all the pumping, selling or marketing and then put his two hands in the Iraqi Government’s pocket and take as much as his want ^_^

North Korea has nuclear weapon, why doesn’t the US attack them? Why would they want to take over a poor land in the expense of billions of dollars and died troops. Why doesn’t the US help Afghanistan to rebuild the country, it is because there is not much natural resources there.

2006-11-29 12:03:28 · update #1

Liberalism is enemy with Communism, why would US want to free their enemy with the expense of uncountable lost? Why would US want to bring Saddam to justice? While there are more rulers out there not much different to Saddam.

Do you think US wants to stabilize Iraq because they want their reputation back? So people honour G.W Bush as a good president? Once Iraq stabilized then it means that Iraq economic is also belong to the US.

No matter how powerful the US, it is still just a Nation, how can 1 nation Vs 10 or more nations (Asia or Indian people or Muslim world) unless he has allies then don’t you think this sound familiar? Guess what? The rise of the WWIII.

2006-11-29 12:04:00 · update #2

Low educated people only see things happening on the performing stage; educated people see things be hide the curtain. The performing in front of the stage is always beautifully designed for the audiences to watch, obviously the performing has to be good in order amuse the audience. For example, you may be jealous of the celebrities’ life, how do you know that they are not jealous of your life?

Low educated people love to hear good or simple stuffs that would pleasant their ears, even though it is not true, and they like to avoid complex things, so they won’t be frustrated to think about it but guess what complex concepts are real and true. Complex concept is reality and reality is painful ^_^ but it is proud to see the true. Simple concept is virtual and easy like counting 1,2 and 3 but it is shameful to not use your ability. This is the biggest failure that the low educated people need to overcome.

2006-11-29 12:04:22 · update #3

7 answers

Well, U.S should finish the job in Iraq.

2006-11-29 12:07:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Bush is totally out of touch with the reality of the situation in Iraq. The country is in the middle of a Civil war that he wont aknowledge. If he doesn't play his cards right (pertaining to Iran) they by the time of US military pullout, Iraq will become a province of Iran or at least a puppet state of Iran. Seeing as its a puppet state of the US now it might not make much difference. This situation coupled with troubles with the Israelis and the Palistinians (not to mention growing tensions in Lebanon) would lead to a large geopolitical conflict in the area which will draw in all major armies. (I.E. WW 3)

2006-11-29 20:17:15 · answer #2 · answered by Ryan W 2 · 0 0

I don't even know where to start with you.....

I am here and I have a lot of Iraqi friends living in Iraq.
They don't have much respect for the Iraqi's who left.
They have even less respect for the American Media which they just cannot understand. They don't understand how we can allow such lies about the Iraqi people to be told.


This is not a Civil War..... it is an insurgency paid for by the countries of Iran, Syria, and a few others. Our own media back in the USA has fallen into its "prime-time rating war" of trying to have the flashiest headlines...... and you are buying it...

2006-12-04 04:03:38 · answer #3 · answered by wolf560 5 · 0 0

Letting George Bush speak in public is as useful as nipples on a bull, and just as productive.

It would be better if he just gave every Iraqi $5,000 and let them have a free for all than the damage we have wrought on their country.

It's a marvel of stupidity that even in the face of defeat, in the obvious case of the Neocons abject failure to succeed or even learn from their defeat (which, like the ostrich with its head firmly buried in the sand - they have yet to acknowledge)the Administration and it's puppetheaded cheerleaders are still out there squeeking lies about how its "getting better" and we are "winning the war" - the only thing we are winning is a zero sum game which can have only losers. Including the American people themselves, who have had their constitutional rights and freedoms date-raped by this fratboy administration and its public shills with their "Gay-Marriage" Rufees, doping the public while they raided the fridge - and the ATM.

2006-11-29 20:11:19 · answer #4 · answered by mytraver 3 · 0 2

US must leave Iraq now to have their own government because Saddam was already neutralized.

2006-11-29 20:05:35 · answer #5 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 2

the thing with suddam is he was bombing his own country and i think its about oil the most and every time the us has friends with other countrys they some how break it

2006-11-29 20:13:31 · answer #6 · answered by peace 2 · 0 0

How stupid... go have tea, with pilosi... Educated or deceived... hum... your a good example of the latter. But hey, have a nice day.

2006-11-29 20:09:03 · answer #7 · answered by drivingi75 2 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers