I hear all the time how O.J was exonerated by the Jury, and how little evidense there was to convict O.J.. (But we all suspect he did it anyway). I find it odd that some of the same people who would defend O.J based on a lack of evidense can make the claim that Jesus is God without even having a scintilla of evidense to prove that.
2006-11-29 10:31:54 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
mindless stupidity, brainwashing and blind ignorance.
2006-11-29 10:33:39 · answer #1 · answered by Jeebus is my Rectum 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
You're right. Proving Jesus as the Son of God under the instructions of a Jury would be very difficult if not impossible, because Jury's are told that if there is reasonable doubt to find the party not-guilty. Sure, from provable facts under our court system, I'm guessing that there is reasonable doubt that Jesus is the Son of God (or is God depending on your point of view).
I personally believe the prosecution and police made some critical errors in the OJ trial, but the jury's instructions aren't to base its decision on what they believe, but on what they know. Give me a fitted glove and I can make it look like it doesn't fit. Hilarious.
I cannot speak for God's reasons for not forcing us to believe in Him or His Son; although, I do agree with the two commandments Jesus gave. Love God, Love your neighbor. If everyone really did do this, the world would be a better place. Too bad we don't.
2006-11-29 10:58:37 · answer #2 · answered by volleyjacket 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let see, DNA evidence showed there was a 1 in 6 billion chance someone other than OJ left his blood on the victims - but then that goes back to science and that is discredited.
But a few old texts is enough for true evidence? Well I will say there could have been a historical Jesus but surely not proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
2006-11-29 10:46:07 · answer #3 · answered by Sage Bluestorm 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus is a proven historical figure jsut as martin Luther King Jr is.
There is a lot of evidence that Jesus was real, and was the Son of God. Many people refuse to even look at it because theyve heard what other people have said about it, but have never looked for themselves.
If you do not beleive in Jesus becuase you dont belive the bible, let me ask you...Have you ever read the bible? Do you think a judge would refuse to look at a piece of evidence simply because other people said "dont bother its not true its a bunch of crap"....of course not.
The evidence is there if you would only look at it.
God bless,
SHane
2006-11-29 10:50:57 · answer #4 · answered by Shane 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't have evidence of Jesus, but concerning OJ: No one deserves to have evidence and testimony presented against them by a PERJURED investigator who is extremely racist and no one deserves to have an investigator take a sample of their blood from a lab and carry it INTO the crime scene. Glove didn't fit, No witnesses. Weapon not connected to him or found. The jury was taken to OJ's house and didn't see the large rumored blood trail. Jury voted "not guilty due to a LACK of real evidence to convict.
2006-12-01 14:51:47 · answer #5 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"The fool says in his heart there is not any God" and that comparable fool many times says that Jesus never existed even nonetheless there's a huge quantity of information that He did. there are various scientists (those beings that atheists look to worship) who be attentive to and not employing a shadow of a doubt that Jesus lived in this earth merely over 2000 years in the past and alter into crucified via Roman squaddies.
2016-12-29 16:34:13 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This assumption requires that you deny all the Biblical and extra-biblical eye-witness testimony for the divinity of Jesus. Whereas, in the case of O.J., there were no eye-witnesses who saw him kill (supposedly) anyone.
Rev. Lonnie Honeycutt
2006-11-29 10:36:41 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Very few historians, biblical scholars, and archaeologists deny that Jesus existed. I don't know of any compelling reason to.
Trivia: The first theologian to deny Jesus existed was Bruno Bauer. He also happened to be the tutor of the teenage Karl Marx.
2006-11-29 10:35:45 · answer #8 · answered by Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Thats not true. I fully believe OJ did it, lol.
As for Jesus, I have seen proof. So yes I do believe in him.
2006-11-29 10:35:47 · answer #9 · answered by Chrissy 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't know what you're talking about. I have all the evidence that I need...sorry you are blind to truth. Don't blame the believer, blame the Creator.
2006-11-29 10:45:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What exactly did Jesus do wrong in the first place?
2006-11-29 10:59:46 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋