Could tiger farms save the species so they are not lost to future generations? What do you think?

Question

Article and podcast here:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6546127

*

Answer 1

It's better to have tiger habitats, such as some plans being proposed for lands set aside in the Rocky Mountain states for the preservation of endangered species. The problem with "farms" is that if fed daily, tigers will forget how to survive in the wild, and would rather just sit around and watch tv.

Answer 2

Why p.c.. on India or China? different worldwide places use much extra of a few materials - as an occasion, the u . s . a . has something like 10% of the worldwide's inhabitants, yet 33% of each and all the obese human beings in the worldwide stay there. for sure in terms of nutrients they are utilising extra effective than their honest proportion of materials. India and China can extra fairly help their populations than another factors of the worldwide (including some worldwide places in Africa), too. Over-inhabitants is a extensive worldwide problem, yet genocide isn't the respond. For a start up, who comes to a decision which persons get killed off? How do you establish who's worth of residing, and who isn't? somebody would stay in an over-crowded section, yet that distinctive could bypass directly to maintain lives as a doctor or something. the answer isn't to kill human beings off, yet to decrease the numbers being born - in places like India, China, Africa and South u . s ., it particularly is approximately convalescing human beings's familiar of residing (a lot of human beings have a extensive variety of youngsters so they have somebody to assist them whilst they are able to no longer artwork, and due to extreme toddler mortality costs) and which potential convalescing heath and coaching. There are different techniques of having the inhabitants down, that don't contain mass homicide.

Answer 3

yes,most likly ,intersting q

Answer 4

A tiger farm?! WHAT???!!!