CHRISTIANS: How rational is blood sacrifice for attonement??

Question

How rational is it for God to sacrifice 'his own innocent son' and he cannot even punish the evil doers who sin all over the earth?

The bible requires a blood sacrifice:
And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission. (Hebrews 9:22)


What does Jesus (peace be upon him) say about this matter:

Jesus was teaching his disciples in the outer court of the Temple and one of them said unto him: Master, it is said by the priests that without shedding of blood there is no remission. Can then the blood offering of the law take away sin? And Jesus answered: No blood offering, of beast or bird, or man, can take away sin, for how can the conscience be purged from sin by the shedding of innocent blood? Nay, it will increase the condemnation. (Gospel of the Nazorenes, Lection 33, verses 1-2)

I find it impossible for a man to offer himself for sacrifice for 'the sins of mankind' when he condemns sacrifice himself.

Answer 1

Yet another contradiction about the Christian faith. The Biblegod seemed to love blood...right until Jesus' blood got spilled, anyway.

Answer 2

If you are going to quote scripture, take it from the Bible, not some obscure gospel.

God said, the wages of sin is death.
Thus a blood sacrifice, as required by biblical law was needed. Jesus was the finisher of the Law. One sacrifice for all.

Answer 3

God became a man in Christ Jesus, a sinless, innocent man, to shed His Blood, as a sacrifice. It is very rational. Without His Blood being shed we would all go to Hell.

Answer 4

Jesus does not say that in the Holy bible,matter of fact just the opposite,there is only atonement in the blood of Jesus

Answer 5

"(Gospel of the Nazorenes, Lection 33, verses 1-2)"

What the heck is that?????

If you going to quote the Bible....use Bible quotes

You know what it says about false teachings...........