"The Code"
2006-11-29 02:54:20 · 18 answers · asked by dustin j 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I'm sorry, Sir, but that question is now 2036 years out of date.
"The Truth"
2006-11-29 02:57:48 · answer #1 · answered by Daimyo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A daughter?! Going by 'The Code'
2006-11-29 02:57:38 · answer #2 · answered by happykat 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
your question is flawed, firstly jesus (if he existed) was a man .
Men cannot have children women have children. Men father children. so the answer in that context is yes?. But it could open a new debate lets see waht happens.
2006-11-29 03:14:27 · answer #3 · answered by dave c 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I imagine he COULD. But he did NOT have relations. He does of Children, the ones that have put their trust in Him.
Don't watch or read the Code.....read THE book. THE HOLY BIBLE. That is were the truth is.
2006-11-29 03:02:00 · answer #4 · answered by Krystle 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that He could have, but that wasn't His purpose for living on earth. If it did not go with what His Father wished for Him, He simply did not do it. He wanted His Father's Will, more than His own. Good Luck!!!
2006-11-29 02:59:26 · answer #5 · answered by pupcake 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus did not have time for family. He was about His Father's work.
2006-11-29 03:04:39 · answer #6 · answered by Fish <>< 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Could He? Of course he could.
Did He? We are all God's children.
2006-11-29 02:56:41 · answer #7 · answered by jinenglish68 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so.
And "Angel Baby", I don't know what Bible you're reading, but it wasn't a sin to not have children.
2006-11-29 02:59:34 · answer #8 · answered by ctaylor717 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You've been reading too many DaVinci Delusion books...
READ THE BIBLE for yurself rather than allowing foolish atheists to tell your what it says>
2006-11-29 02:59:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was able to have children, because a sacrifice for sin had to be perfect.
But He did not have any.
2006-11-29 03:05:21 · answer #10 · answered by tim 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋