2006-11-29 02:42:55 · 9 answers · asked by jsjmlj 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Quakers, Buddhists, Unitarians, and Atheists
2006-11-29 02:47:17 · answer #1 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Morals are an adopted code of behavior - a social contract. What seems moralistic to one religion may be in conflict with another...I couldn't say which religion (or anti-religion) is more in line with today's majority view of ethical behavior because I don't think there is a consensus...but IF one were deemed more moral than another, it would still depend on the practitioners. My own morals are based on 'enlightened self-interest'. If every single person always does what they think is RIGHT, then who will judge what is 'good' or 'bad'?
2006-11-29 10:59:03 · answer #2 · answered by ... 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Buddhism
2006-11-29 10:52:59 · answer #3 · answered by Heron By The Sea 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
each religion, and by the way if you look closely they're all pretty much the same, has its own standards of morality. so wouln't they all be as moral as the others? who's to say the the morals of one religion are better than those of any other?
2006-11-29 11:01:09 · answer #4 · answered by susiemama 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Atheism is not a religion. anyway, i think the Buddhists are pretty good. I'm a big fan of the Dali Lama. And Zoroastrians are pretty cool
2006-11-29 10:47:25 · answer #5 · answered by smm 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Funny how the consensus is usually Buddhism-the one religion without dogma, Gods or theology. Is that just a coincidence?
2006-11-29 10:55:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Buddhists
2006-11-29 10:53:00 · answer #7 · answered by deathsdoor474 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Atheism.
2006-11-29 10:45:46 · answer #8 · answered by enslavementality 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm going with buddhism.
2006-11-29 10:53:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋