OUTSIDE THE WOMB! cant do it or you just too chicken? if either is the case then dont make ridiculous claims about life beginning at conception!
2006-11-28 23:47:07 · 16 answers · asked by badferret 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
its pathetic that people whould rather insult me and try to bait me with christian catch phrases, just shows ME what kind of people Im dealing with, its very sad.
2006-11-28 23:55:32 · update #1
nobody likes a challenge theyd rather ignore and hope it goes away
2006-11-28 23:51:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Friend you put a challenge there for Christains, & I am a Christian, I guess you thought you had us christian at a point of no answer. Now Friend I will acept your Challenge, will you accept my challenge, If you don't think some form of life begins at conception & that embroy is not alive, Then You just leave it in the womb, If it is not alive, then you won't have to worry about that woman having a baby, Hey remember you said it is not alive, so then leave it in her womb, she has nothing to worry about, It will not completely develope into a baby but stay at that point of conception, But not my critic, If there is life at conception, what happens in 9 months. Remember now you say there is no life at conception, & I say there is, Now you prove to me either by your own ideals(which is not worth 2 cents) Or Bible, Or Science that there is no living life at conception, You can not do it, Because if that embroy is not alive, then it will not develope into a baby, But if it does develope into a baby, why did that happen, Because there was life at conception, & Life come from oxygen, therefore that Embroy get oxygen from it's mother Until it is born & then God puts that breath of life into that baby to breath on it's own. Now Come on with your challenge & my Challenge.
2006-11-29 00:00:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
One would desire to first understand what a soul is and what a spirit is? Many have faith that those words recommend something invisible and immortal that exists interior us. they think of that at loss of existence this invisible component of a human leaves the physique and lives on. because of the fact this perception is so universal, many are stunned to learn that it is not in any respect what the Bible teaches. What, then, is the soul, and what's the spirit, in accordance to God’s be conscious? From the passage which you used, Gen 2:7, it of course says that adam grew to grow to be a living soul. It does no longer say that adam replaced into "given" a soul. It skill then that Adam himself is a soul. In Romans 13:a million, we examine that each soul would desire to be in subjection to larger powers or authority, of course soul refers to human beings themselves, to no longer some invisible component of human. What bearing directly to the spirit? Psalms 104:29 explains that if the spirit is taken away one expires, comparable experience with James 2:26 "a physique w/o a spirit is lifeless." of course then spirit is a existence stress which God breath into Adam to grow to be a living soul. The soul then is us ourselves, our physique. Then the spirit is the single that makes stay.
2016-10-13 08:20:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a pretty stupid arguement.......EVERYTHING has to go through it's natural development cycle.
Just because a baby can't live outside the womb at the moment of conception doesn't mean it isn't alive. It is still a life and it's still murder to kill it.
Let me make YOUR case for you....
You have a baby , Let that baby take care of itself. Feed itself, everything. If it can't do this and dies because you didn't care for it, you're going to jail for murder.
Obvioulsy it can't, because it has to develop to the point where it can do these things.
2006-11-29 00:08:57 · answer #4 · answered by kenny p 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
A) Leave religion out of it, sweetie! Think genetically. As soon as the genes are set and the polar body cast off, that little single cell is as human as its parents. Why? Because every gene it's got is a human gene and the only thing it hasn't got is sheer number of cells. You're trillions of cells, it's one, but genetically there's NO DIFFERENCE!
B) By your "logic" every person who requires ANY kind of assistance to live is NOT HUMAN and should be expunged. How often have you read "Mein Kampf" anyway? Are you a member of the Aryan Brotherhood? If not, why not? For you, that'd be like coming home.
C) MERRY CHRISTMAS! anyway. You poor sod.
2006-11-28 23:56:50 · answer #5 · answered by Granny Annie 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Your arguement is absurd. So your point is that if a baby can not live outside the womb it is not alive? If a fish can not live outside of water is it not alive? If a man can not live under water is he also dead? Being a living being has nothing to do with environment. Our evironment sustains us but it is not how we measure whether or not we are living beings it may measure how long we live. All of us depend on our envronment to survive yet that doesnt mean we are not alive.
2006-11-29 00:07:19 · answer #6 · answered by djmantx 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You'll believe all living things derived from a living single-celled organism that came from nothing,yet you can't believe a human life begins at conception. Human life DOES begin at the moment of conception,because that human life grows from the moment of conception. Life grows,non-life doesn't.
2006-11-29 00:17:18 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If life doesn't start until after the baby has been born, they why do women have to go to the doctors for monthly check ups to ensure the safety of their baby. Why can you hear your babies heartbeat while he/she is still in the womb. Why can you see the babies arms, legs, fingers, toes, eyes, mouth during a sonogram if life doesn't start until after the baby has been born.
2006-11-29 00:00:12 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
there are different orders and levels of life. a tiny microscopic cell is some form of life. There cant be fetal development without life
2006-11-29 00:04:43 · answer #9 · answered by Gre2000 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Life BEGINS at conception, but cannot be sustained outside of its mothers womb.
I would say to you that according to your theory, then a newborn babe cannot be life either as it cannot be sustained without nourishment and protection.
2006-11-29 00:00:37 · answer #10 · answered by arewethereyet 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I wouldn't want to do that. God made the womb a place for the baby to develop. But would you like to be sent to someplace like the moon as you are to live... No, your body couldn't stand it, just as a young baby needs its special God given environment, we need Gods special environment (Earth) to live.
2006-11-28 23:55:55 · answer #11 · answered by RB 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋