nooooooooooooo
never!!!!!!!!
2006-11-28 22:16:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
depends on how they come out. If they can still make the cut, then no. But they might also be missing more than they could know, or be tested on for that matter. There is more weight on being in some classes than others. so you can't say this across the board, though some people try, and some teachers are just angry that students don't show up. When you pay for college though, you decide if you want to go to class or not. And the teachers decide if they want to fail you or not. Its almost always written in the syllabus the absence policy, so one will know that if they miss so many days what the outcome will be.
2006-11-28 22:23:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, My opinion is that students should visit classes by their own will. If you want to learn you learn, If you think you already know some stuff you are supposed to learn you may skip it and spend your time the way more suitable for you. Whether student is failed or not - should be determined by exams.
2006-11-28 22:33:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ugi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes unless they were ill then should be allowed to catch up. If you are astudent you want to learn missing 10% of available learning doesn't seem like you would be a very interested student
2006-11-28 22:17:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
In my university, 75% attendance is compusary. But I think it should be brought down to 60% I mean come on, forcing students to attend lectures isnt the solution.
2006-11-28 22:23:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No they should be failed if they get below pass mark in their exams
2006-11-28 22:20:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋