2006-11-28 20:22:28 · 7 answers · asked by Alliance F 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The bible doesn't mention it if he did. I would think he would have mentioned it in his writings if he did.
2006-11-28 20:29:39 · answer #1 · answered by upsman 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, though they were same age, Saul was in Turkey. He was the first Apostle to have not actually met Jesus. You could say he was the first to be brainwashed into the religion, from the point of view of the Jews. Paul was very well educated and believed in continuing to take in accurate knowledge. He became disappointed in many Christians as time passed, because they had returned to the holidays and observances of men.
2006-11-28 20:38:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Scripture is silent on the issue; but Paul, being a devout jew, no doubt would have been in Jerusalem during the mandatory Sabbaths and feast days and would have had many occasions to hear Jesus preach, if not meet Him personally.
2006-11-28 20:30:39 · answer #3 · answered by revulayshun 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
According to scripture, no. Paul was out of Jerusalem when Jesus was there.
2006-11-28 20:31:47 · answer #4 · answered by martha d 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never, he was neither an apostle.
2006-11-28 20:38:55 · answer #5 · answered by Slave 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Rev gave you the best answer so far.
2006-11-28 20:38:40 · answer #6 · answered by jack 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO
2006-11-28 20:27:02 · answer #7 · answered by chris_muriel007 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋