Actually, I'd go, and I would wear my nametag. I'm not ashamed of a single question or answer I've made.
I do think that the room would split into believers and non-believers, and we'd probably send out "champions" from each side to fight one-on-one to the death, until only one remained.
2006-11-30 15:09:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure most people would admit to saying such ridiculous things in public. At least those who pose meaningless questions to Christians all the time, excusing the meaningful ones that is.
2006-11-28 18:53:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it would be full of mostly physically ugly people. I'm sure the main topic would be trying to figure out who is whom. I bet people would not be so brave or confrontational when not hidden behind a screen name.
Blessings
David
2006-11-28 19:00:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by David T 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably if "name tags" were required, many would falsify theirs, because they wouldn't want to cop to some of the crap they've posted here. Anonymity is like alcohol. It removes inhibitions and many become suddenly very brave. Take the cloak away and they scatter like cockroaches.
2006-11-28 19:01:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by MyPreshus 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol I think this is a good question. I would love to see it... I personally would get along with anyone who did not try and persuade me not to believe in God...
2006-11-28 18:52:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Alicia S 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Heck yes. We hang out with "non-believers" all the time. We are quite capable of talking about other things you know. We/they have a great time.
2006-11-28 18:54:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by <><><> 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
What Yahoo party?
2006-11-28 18:52:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
LMAO!
The invitation should read.... BYOB and BYOF? bring your own booze and bring your own faith?
2006-11-28 19:03:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋