I would like to see what article(s) and references you are citing for this information.
2006-11-29 07:18:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by tchem75 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I disagree. About 80% of life in planet earth lives in the ocean. The other ten percent lives on land and it includes other animals such as bears etc.
If less than 10% of the entire earthly population is of the human being species, it does not make sense that we have consumed or about to consume all life in the ocean. Even if we had fished most of the fish out of the ocean, there are places among the sea that cannot be rowed upon such as the Bermuda triangles and such. There are defenitely places that are hard to get to out in the sea and as long as those are there, the animals that reside in those waters are well and alive.
If you are asking this question to type a school report I suggest that you look for this porcentage online and include it as a citation.
SAVE NEMO THE FISH! EAT MORE MAD COWS!
2006-11-28 18:37:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by geniusflightnurse 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Look at the animals like penguins and polar bears that will become extinct if the temp. goes up a couple more degrees! There is such a demand of fish and seafood worldwide that fishermen can ask for any price. With that incentive they aren't likely to give up the money. I think soy protein needs to be worked with as far as crop increase, public awareness and public acceptance of this food after work has been done to make it more palatable for all the different cultures faced with a fish and meat shortage. Great question! Best of luck to you!!
2006-11-28 18:44:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by whrldpz 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Scientists count variety the variety of fish in a given section and then use shown statistical diagnosis the thank you to stay with those numbers to bigger factors. there's a large variety of challenge that governments worldwide are merely utilising alarming medical findings with reference to the state of the ambience to squeeze extra money out of the populous and benefit extra administration over human beings, and that they are, yet that doesn't discredit the findings of the scientists who're attempting to alert the loads. what's substantial to understand is that because of the fact the commercial age, the worldwide inhabitants has went throughout the time of the roof, and what is going up could come down. The inhabitants fee is unsustainable because of the fact we've grown to the element that we are utilising materials swifter than the planet can fill up them. it particularly is usually a breach of "carrying potential". each time this has occurred for the period of wide-unfold historical past, circumstances get tough....very tough.
2016-10-04 12:18:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That freaks me out. What also freaks me out is all of the undiscovered species in the ocean.
2006-11-28 18:36:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Go back to Dr. PETA and let him know that we're smarter than that.
2006-11-28 19:07:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by asshat.mcpoop 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Scientists are full of Sh*t
2006-11-28 18:31:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Gertie 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
we will die
2006-11-28 18:30:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jessy 5
·
0⤊
1⤋