2006-11-28 17:16:43 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Not all people do that
2006-11-28 17:18:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
because openly the government is defying people with tweaking laws to help corporations beat hi cost so the economic number look good but don't show the facts, just like after someone doesn't work any more they just dropout person from being, only the Numbers they want are kept the way they want them, so we are only a deprived nation have an abortion from white people and is going to get layed in Mexico for saving a buck and with this knowledge we figure five years at the most we can live with out right blatant lies for a future when their corporations in mass have no morality nor money to fund a future even if it's with cheap labor it's still a band aid and is doomed, so everyone who will survive in the near future will do it now, life is now computerized as 1906 and headed for 1929, and is not in real time it is all b s and you'll not now truth because there is a factual driven pre existing knowledge of absentee leadership malfunctioning for it diversion to not go into the new century but to force preexisting pas st by operating this way cheaper, we are as cheap now as we accused japan of being when they produced cheap stuff for America and we don't have proof of life
2006-11-29 01:30:39 · answer #2 · answered by bev 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Morality is very subjective and NOT an absolute...not everyone thinks the same things are evil...and in that being the case...moral issues should be left up to the indivieual (s) involved and NO ONE else should have any say what so ever...on ANY level.
So, to answer the question...they may not see it as morally evil....
2006-11-29 01:20:37 · answer #3 · answered by kveldulf_gondlir 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That deppends on what is morally evil. I think we're all agreed that murder is wrong, so is taking what doesn't belong to you. But when you get into the gray areas like sex, each person has their own idea of right and wrong.
I will ring your doorbell and run away!!!
2006-11-29 01:19:53 · answer #4 · answered by Satan Lord of Flames 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Evil is such a relative thing. My moral could be considered just fine to some, evil to others.
2006-11-29 01:18:51 · answer #5 · answered by i luv teh fishes 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If God is a God of love, why hasn’t He dealt with evil?"
In Dr. Robert Morey’s book The New Atheism and the Erosion of Freedom, he talks with an atheist about this issue. The atheist assumes that everything is relative, and there are no absolutes (he is absolutely sure of that). Morey replies that the first thing an atheist must do is prove the existence of evil. By what process can an atheist identify evil? He must have a universal absolute to do so. Without an absolute reference point for "good" (which only God can provide), no one can identify what is good or evil. Thus without the existence of God, there is no "evil" or "good" in an absolute sense. Everything is relative. The problem of evil does not negate the existence of God. It actually requires it.
Many assume that because evil still exists today, God has not dealt with it. How can atheists assume that God has not already solved the problem of evil in such a way that neither His goodness nor omnipotence is limited? On what grounds do they limit what God can and cannot do to solve the problem? God has already solved the problem of evil. And He did it in a way in which He did not contradict His nature or the nature of man. We assume God will solve the problem of evil in one single act. But why can’t He deal with evil in a progressive way? Can’t He deal with it throughout time as we know it, and then bring it to the climax on the Day of Judgment?
God sent His Son to die on the cross in order to solve the problem of evil. Christ atoned for evil and secured the eventual removal of all evil from the earth. One day evil will be quarantined in one spot called "hell." Then there will be a perfect world devoid of all evil. If God declared that all evil would, at this moment, cease to exist, you and I and all of humanity would go up in a puff of smoke. Divine judgment demands that sin be punished.
By Ron Meade
2006-11-29 01:19:59 · answer #6 · answered by I_Need_Help 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Either people do not believe in morals, or they do, but choose to be hypocrites and not follow them. Either ignorance or arrogance. It feels like morals are rotting in today's world, and without them, there will be serious consequences, no matter what you believe.
2006-11-29 01:24:26 · answer #7 · answered by Give me best answer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on what you consider morally evil, one person may believe that dancing or wearing lipstick is evil, that doesn't necessarily make it so.
2006-11-29 01:20:00 · answer #8 · answered by mightymite1957 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Who draws the line? Who gets to decide what is moral and what not? isn't that a personal limit we each must set?
2006-11-29 01:21:33 · answer #9 · answered by Socratic Pig 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The perceived benefits outweigh the perceived costs. Also morality is highly subjective.
2006-11-29 01:18:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋