She is messed up with that kind of thinking.
Coach
2006-11-28 16:13:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Thanks for the Yahoo Jacket 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well, yeah--it's obvious you are biased, but try to look at the facts objectively. Number One--and it's a BIG #1: Marijuana is illegal, and thus the possible legal conseuquences are FAR worse than those of cigs. Also, although it's a cliche, Pot often times does lead to other drug use. I know VERY few people who have only smoked pot and not even experimented with any other drugs. Also, pot IS four times as carcinogenic to the lungs as cigs. Granted, the volume of smoke is often less, but still: people get lung cancer from pot too. Also, marijuana (THC) has been proven to lower sperm count drastically and increase the chance of birth defects. (Look this up if you doubt me.) Pot also lowers motivational levels and stunts social learning.
So...while neither is an ideal vice, in view of all the consequences possible, I'd much rather have my kids smoke cigarettes.
2006-11-28 16:15:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
For some reason, there are lots of people who try to convince themselves that, physically, pot is not bad for you. Take a look at the inside of a pipe, all that gunk is getting in your lungs EVERY time you take a hit. Far more gunk per cigarette than plain old tobacco, which is really nasty, too. I say this as an ex-smoker (2 packs a day) and very occasional (parties) pot-smoker.
2006-11-28 16:11:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by mysterymardi 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
smoking anything is bad for you. the smoke in marijuana has about 10 times more carcinogens in it than an unfiltered cigarette. why do you think pot heads cough their lungs up every time they take a hit? water pipes don't filter out much. additionally marijuana has no controls over it so much of it is full of bacteria and fungi that grow happily on it. most people "in the know" microwave it to kill off unfriendly bacteria that could lead to lung infections and other things. marijuana has about 50 times more carcinogens than tobacco if you injest it remember pot brownies? yummy mouth and throat cancers! if you have to use marijuana buy a vaporizor. no offense but you are way off base. be glad your friends kid has your friend for a mom instead of you.
2006-11-28 16:21:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think cigarettes and pot are both bad for your health. It's never healthy to inhale smoke into your lungs whether it's once a day or 20 times a day.
2006-11-28 16:08:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by two_kee_kees 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Pot has more tar, cigs have more gas and terpentine. I say smoke both at the same time, pull a junior.
2006-11-28 16:28:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by broken 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
you're able to bear in mind, she's no longer hurting an harmless infant, she's hurting her harmless infant, and that makes each and all the version in the worldwide. people who're dumb, lazy, ignorant or carry to irrational techniques produce dumb, lazy, ignorant and irrational infants. there is not any way around it, in spite of state involvement, adoption or intervention of any variety. a man or woman's childrens continuously belong to them and could continuously prove like them, and that's for the superb, because of the fact it particularly is going to at last do away with them from the gene pool, and humanity would be the extra effective for it. So merely techniques your man or woman company and picture of the baby because of the fact the lost reason that it particularly is.
2016-10-04 12:15:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
personally I also would want neither but if they have to do something than I would perfer pot over cigs pot is natural and is way better for your health as opposed to ciggarettes and way less addicting. I think your friend needs to do her homework on the cons of both to weigh it out properly
2006-11-28 16:10:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kara B 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well, pot definately is safer. Like you, I smoke pot and not cigarettes. Pot when broken down contains roughly 800 different chemicals....whereas tobbaco has an excess of 4000. People are just so closed minded about my sweet sweet mary jane.
2006-11-28 16:09:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
cigarettes,are far more addictive and harm full that pot is
it has additives to make it more addictive and burn faster,
pot is still Natural with out chemical interference,and does not have nicotine
instead it has a whole range of medicinal properties,
your friend has not researched the subject thoroughly and does not know
2006-11-28 16:16:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree WITH you....while pot is natural/cigarettes are full of chemicals and stuff...seems like the "healthier" choice if ya can call it that would be pot....I am an ex-pot smoker and a current cigarette smoker!
2006-11-28 16:09:33
·
answer #11
·
answered by justmedrt 6
·
1⤊
1⤋