English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

(All these are just opinions, no logical support or source) Before you decide on the percents please keep these in mind:
- Iraq has so much oil and do you think the US will gives that land to other countries after they had done so much to dominate the land.
- US only lost their troops in Iraq right now, because the terrorists are too busy to kick them out of the country, but if they left Iraq then the terrorist will be more free to do their job; don't you think the US afraid that the terrorists will bomb their country after they left the golden land.
- To me I think the US is not losing much because they pumped out so much oil and their troops mainly is protect the oil fields, which means the death of their armies are really minimum for a 6 years war. The Iraqis kill and bomb their own people, this will lead to civil war and the US can pretend that they are under pressure but really they are laughing like hell and I don't think they are going to cry for the death Iraqis there.

2006-11-28 15:59:09 · 18 answers · asked by Hermes 2 in Politics & Government Military

1 percent = no
100 percents = yes
50 percents = not sure or 50/50

next post will be my opinions on Bush's comments on Irag.

2006-11-28 16:10:21 · update #1

When is the Iraqis become terrorists, US bombed their country, so the Iraqis bombed them back. Wealthy Americans bombed them in a pretty way with tanks, aircrafts, missiles, etc… Poor Iraqis bombed them in an uglier way, with suicide bomb, hidden landmine etc… Even though they are using different method but the result is the same ^_^

If you think US in Iraq is not because of oil then I am pretty sure that you are in the lowest quintile, I am not trying to insult you because you are the one that insulting me ^_^ If I am wrong then which mean that I am the one in the lowest quintile not you lol…

If US playing god to save Iraq, why the United Nation didn’t support them, and even their own Americans people didn’t support him that is why he lost the two houses ^_^ US didn’t even have coalition to support them in the war, don’t tell me their coalitions are England and Japan.

2006-11-29 11:52:36 · update #2

If the US steals oil from Iraq, do you think they are stupid enough to do it in an obvious way? For example use ships or airplanes to transport every pumped barrel of oil back to the Unite State so every one can see and envy the American people, No lol… they can just let the Iraqi people do all the pumping, selling or marketing and then put his two hands in the Iraqi Government’s pocket and take as much as his want ^_^

North Korea has nuclear weapon, why doesn’t the US attack them? Why would they want to take over a poor land in the expense of billions of dollars and died troops. Why doesn’t the US help Afghanistan to rebuild the country, it is because there is not much natural resources there.

Liberalism is enemy with Communism, why would US want to free their enemy with the expense of uncountable lost? Why would US want to bring Saddam to justice? While there are more rulers out there not much different to Saddam.

2006-11-29 11:53:13 · update #3

Do you think US wants to stabilize Iraq because they want their reputation back? So people honour G.W Bush as a good president? Once Iraq stabilized then it means that Iraq economic is also belong to the US.

No matter how powerful the US, it is still just a Nation, how can 1 nation Vs 10 or more nations (Asia or Indian people or Muslim world) unless he has allies then don’t you think this sound familiar? Guess what? The rise of the WWIII.


Low educated people only see things happening on the performing stage; educated people see things be hide the curtain. The performing in front of the stage is always beautifully designed for the audiences to watch, obviously the performing has to be good in order amuse the audience. For example, you may be jealous of the celebrities’ life, how do you know that they are not jealous of your life?

2006-11-29 11:53:30 · update #4

Low educated people love to hear good or simple stuffs that would pleasant their ears, even though it is not true, and they like to avoid complex things, so they won’t be frustrated to think about it but guess what complex concepts are real and true. Complex concept is reality and reality is painful ^_^ but it is proud to see the true. Simple concept is virtual and easy like counting 1,2 and 3 but it is shameful to not use your ability. This is the biggest failure that the low educated people need to overcome.

2006-11-29 11:53:56 · update #5

18 answers

65

2006-11-28 16:02:37 · answer #1 · answered by cold runner 5 · 0 0

Oil has little to do with what is going on in Iraq. The problem of having Saddam in power with actual or potential WMD's has of course been solved, but it has been replaced with the problem of what to do about the near-anarchy that now prevails there. One thing is clear: if the US were to withdraw before the Iraqi national government can actually rule the country, the Iraqi hinterlands will become a playground for Taliban and al Qaeda types, and at some point we would have very serious regrets about having let that happen.

2006-11-29 00:07:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Its an 88; likely withdrawal will occur within 3 years. It will yet be too soon.

Scenario: In 2007, the new Dems, though publicly supporting the troops and their important mission, invite 100 al Queda leaders to speak in the Congressional chambers. Immediately following this, they are convinced that these "gentlemen" just want peace.

Immediately, they hire a perfectly biased federal judge and successfully impeach the Pres & VP, putting the first US queen into the Oval Office. Pres. Pelosi builds a new Cabinet with Barney Frank as Sec. of State, and hires Jimmy Carter to a chief advisory position. Pelosi's first executive order: load all ships and aircraft and evacuate all press and military personell from Iraq.

Then the Iraq carnage escalates beyond belief, with the deaths of 65% of all people within the borders of Iraq. All "moderate Muslims", suspected moderate Muslims, rumored moderate Muslims, and all "helpers of the Great Satan United States and Zion" are publicly beheaded. People from every nation are next. All non-Arabic people, of any nation, who do not have Mohammed's blood in them, have their blood spilled.

CNN happily pays 330 million dollars directly to Osama bin Laden for exclusive broadcast rights to these events. It obtains on-site interviews with smiling, sword-wielding 10-year old executioners.

What joy is found by those in power now - finally Iraq is free and cleansed. CNN closes each night's broadcasts with a happy tune entitled "Now there is Peace in Babylon". The smiling, laughing news anchors all rise to dance to the music.

Israel is next. Of all, the Jews are of a special delicious target, and now, their only ally, the US, has abandoned them too.....


Sorry. It's just too depressing to continue..

2006-11-29 03:28:38 · answer #3 · answered by oldenoughtoknowbetter 1 · 1 0

1% or less that we will leave Iraq by the time Bush goes into the books as the worst President in American history.
Thank you Mr. Bush for repeating the same ideas and words you have been using for five months now. The election of 2006 proved that the majority of people have turned there hearing aids off to you on this line of reasoning.
Why you might ask? Because you have been exactly wrong about everything you have order in Iraq. Would you like me to go through the list from invasion up through today.
But, I must say that you are consistent. You stick with your perfect record of being wrong no matter what happens. Right now you are saying that you will not pull troops out of Iraq until the United States wins the War, but the problem is that you have never been able to describe a bottom line solution to the problems in Iraq. You asked for elections in Iraq and you got them, but they were not relevant. The only government in Iraq is the run by and of guns and bombs and who can kill who the most. That is not a government mr. Bush. Miliki and the Green Zone boys are irrelevant to the situation in Iraq.
By the way, the problems in Iraq were caused by your invasion of Iraq Mr. Bush. So the solution I would suggest is to uninvade Iraq at a shock and awe pace back over the same border you came from.

2006-11-29 00:16:41 · answer #4 · answered by zclifton2 6 · 0 3

If the troops are protecting "all this oil" you claim "we are pumping out", then why isn't a gallon of gas down to 25 cents?

Geez, after hearing all these liberals screaming about "It's all about the OIL", well, I for one, WISH IT WAS. I wish we were stealing it all under the table and getting it back to Pre-Reagan $1.00 a gallon levels again.

As far as your percents, I have no idea what you're asking.

2006-11-29 00:04:51 · answer #5 · answered by asshat.mcpoop 4 · 1 0

I cannot answer on 1-100 because you did not say what 100 means.

1. If we wanted Iraq's oil, we could have taken it. We could have easily have drilled for it on US soil. There is plenty of it, but we allow the environmentalists to block drilling

2. The biggest problem with cutting and running in Iraq is the bad guys would not fear us anymore. Without fear, they will launch attacks everywhere.

3. You make little sense.

2006-11-29 00:04:17 · answer #6 · answered by GOPneedsarealconservative 4 · 1 1

I'm not sure what your scale means herpes, but I can tell you that once the democrats get into office the war will be long, well financed and one of attrition.

Oh BTW, oil has nothing to do with it. Oil profits from Iraq stay in Iraq, per, President Bush.

2006-11-29 00:16:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

99

2006-11-29 01:30:12 · answer #8 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0 0

92% the USA will cut and run from Iraq. How do I know? I was in from 1969 to 1975 when we ran from Vietnam.

2006-11-29 00:40:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

-100 although it should. But even in the event of an total take over by the democrats The powers that be are still primarily controled by the interests of big business. There will always be a U.S. presence in the country whether it be up front or covert.

2006-11-29 00:24:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers